These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10467465)

  • 1. The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives.
    Glaser DN
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Sep; 8(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 10467465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding statistical significance.
    Hayat MJ
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20445438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students.
    Taylor S; Muncer S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research.
    Murphy SA; Johnson LC
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1253-7; discussion 1259-62. PubMed ID: 8817799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
    Sim J; Reid N
    Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical and nonstatistical significance: implications for health care researchers.
    Baghi H; Noorbaloochi S; Moore JB
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2007; 16(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 17426608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems with null hypothesis significance testing.
    Gliner JA; Morgan GA; Leech NL; Harmon RJ
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2001 Feb; 40(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 11211375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical and clinical significance: alternative methods for understanding the importance of research findings.
    Glaros AG
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2004; 50(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 15481525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.
    Balluerka Lasa N; Vergara Iraeta AI; Arnau Gras J
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 19178869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
    Evans D; Kowanko I
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology.
    Fidler F; Burgman MA; Cumming G; Buttrose R; Thomason N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1539-44. PubMed ID: 17002771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on the use of confidence intervals in psychiatric research.
    Borenstein M
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1994; 30(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 7831461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary analysis: theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations.
    Clarke SP; Cossette S
    Can J Nurs Res; 2000 Dec; 32(3):109-29. PubMed ID: 11928128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
    Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extracting a maximum of useful information from statistical research data.
    Sohlberg S; Andersson G
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 15660635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
    Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.