196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1046758)
1. Law for the nurse supervisor. Right to psychiatric treatment.
Creighton H
Superv Nurse; 1976 May; 7(5):70-1. PubMed ID: 1046758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Right to treatment.
Cohen I; Cohen NL; Sadoff RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1231943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states.
Clayton T
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risks of state and private hospital psychiatrists in involuntary hospitalization in re: right to treatment.
Sadoff RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 3(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 990497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Madness, committal and society: psychiatry in the service of the law?
Peszke MA
Conn Med; 1976 Oct; 40(10):705-6, 708-12. PubMed ID: 975799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Current status of institutionalized mental health patients' right to refuse psychotropic drugs.
Kemna DJ
J Leg Med; 1985 Mar; 6(1):107-38. PubMed ID: 2860193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients' rights and the psychiatrist's dilemma.
Kopolow LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 1027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
Neff RC
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
Meisel A
Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
Davoli JI
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness.
Burgett DW
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Law-medicine notes. The right to psychiatric treatment: a "simple decision" in the Supreme Court.
Curran WJ
N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(10):487-8. PubMed ID: 1152864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
