184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10468356)
1. Effects of local skull inhomogeneities on EEG source estimation.
Ollikainen JO; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
Med Eng Phys; 1999 Apr; 21(3):143-54. PubMed ID: 10468356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG in neonates: Forward modeling and sensitivity analysis with respect to variations of the conductivity.
Azizollahi H; Darbas M; Diallo MM; Badia AE; Lohrengel S
Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):905-932. PubMed ID: 30380315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.
Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé M; Lemahieu I; Boon P
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 11094809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models.
Pohlmeier R; Buchner H; Knoll G; Rienäcker A; Beckmann R; Pesch J
Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9104826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-layer-isotropic skull conductivity representation in the EEG forward problem using spherical head models.
Cuartas-Morales E; Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Castellanos-Dominguez G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4904-7. PubMed ID: 25571091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Source estimation in the human brain from EEG based on the SSB Head Model.
Musha T; Ivanov V; Konyshev V
Methods Inf Med; 1994 Mar; 33(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 8177061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of skull sutures, spongiform bone distribution, and aging skull conductivities on the EEG forward and inverse problems.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 34915464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling of post-surgical brain and skull defects in the EEG inverse problem with the boundary element method.
Bénar CG; Gotman J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 113(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 11801424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's.
Cuffin BN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8468075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conductivity ratios of the scalp-skull-brain head model in estimating equivalent dipole sources in human brain.
Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE
Neurosci Res; 1995 Mar; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 7792082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of EEG electrode density on dipole localization accuracy using two realistically shaped skull resistivity models.
Laarne PH; Tenhunen-Eskelinen ML; Hyttinen JK; Eskola HJ
Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 10912732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
