229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10468469)
1. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
Ludlow JB; Abreu M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of angular disparity of basis images and projection geometry on caries detection using tuned-aperture computed tomography.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Sep; 92(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 11552158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generation of TACT image slices using different reconstruction algorithms: effects on natural caries detection.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Nov; 92(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 11709697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TACT imaging of primary caries.
Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of the number of iterative restorations on tuned aperture computed tomography for approximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 11641731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of lighting conditions on caries interpretation with a laptop computer in a clinical setting.
Kutcher MJ; Kalathingal S; Ludlow JB; Abreu M; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Oct; 102(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 16997122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
