These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10468471)

  • 21. Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study.
    Said KN; Abu Khalid AS; Farook FF
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 6(4):462-469. PubMed ID: 32329230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurement in vivo of masticatory mucosal thickness with 20 MHz B-mode ultrasonic diagnostic equipment.
    Uchida H; Kobayashi K; Nagao M
    J Dent Res; 1989 Feb; 68(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 2645334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate.
    Yilmaz HG; Boke F; Ayali A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 25817728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ueno D; Sekiguchi R; Morita M; Jayawardena A; Shinpo S; Sato J; Kobayashi K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 24548316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The significance of biotype in the predictability of dental-periodontal treatment].
    Palkovics D; Gera I
    Fogorv Sz; 2016 Jun; 109(2):45-55. PubMed ID: 27544964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dimensional changes in soft tissues around dental implants following free gingival grafting: an experimental study in dogs.
    Bengazi F; Lang NP; Caroprese M; Urbizo Velez J; Favero V; Botticelli D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 24151824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gingival thickness in dogs: association with age, gender, and dental arch location.
    Kyllar M; Witter K
    J Vet Dent; 2008 Jun; 25(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 18751660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location.
    Vandana KL; Savitha B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 32(7):828-30. PubMed ID: 15966893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Use of High-Frequency Ultrasound in the Measurement of Thickness of the Maxillary Attached Gingiva.
    Tzoumpas M; Mohr B; Kurtulus-Waschulewski I; Wahl G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(4):374-82. PubMed ID: 26218020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Soft tissue image reconstruction using cone-beam computed tomography combined with laser scanning: a novel method to evaluate the masticatory mucosa.
    Yan S; Shi SG; Niu ZY; Pei ZH; Shi SM; Mu C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Dec; 118(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 25457890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa and its relationship with different parameters in Turkish subjects.
    Yaman D; Aksu S; Dişçi R; Demirel K
    Int J Med Sci; 2014; 11(10):1009-14. PubMed ID: 25076847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High-resolution dental magnetic resonance imaging for planning palatal graft surgery-a clinical pilot study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Kästel T; Heil A; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Apr; 45(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 29334405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pressure-pain threshold determination in the oral mucosa: validity and reliability.
    Ogimoto T; Ogawa T; Sumiyoshi K; Matsuka Y; Koyano K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jul; 29(7):620-6. PubMed ID: 12153450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of palatal mucosal thickness and its association with age and gender.
    Gupta N; Hungund S; Astekar MS; Dodani K
    Biotech Histochem; 2014 Oct; 89(7):481-7. PubMed ID: 24665938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal reference line for determination of the location of the maxillary mucogingival junction in the orthopantomogram.
    Ainamo A
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1977 Apr; 73(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 877091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Thickness of the palatal masticatory mucosa with reference to autogenous grafting: a cadaveric and histologic study.
    Yu SK; Lee MH; Kim CS; Kim DK; Kim HJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2014; 34(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 24396846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study.
    Sharma S; Thakur SL; Joshi SK; Kulkarni SS
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 May; 5(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 23355379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of age on the location of the maxillary mucogingival junction.
    Ainamo A
    J Periodontal Res; 1978 May; 13(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 149189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of variation in the palatal gingival biotypes using an ultrasound device.
    Rajpoot N; Nayak A; Nayak R; Bankur PK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC56-60. PubMed ID: 25954707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.