174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10470164)
1. Tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: histopathology, staging and prognosis.
Hermanek P
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2393-6. PubMed ID: 10470164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma.
Hermanek P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 2015921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Pape UF; Jann H; Müller-Nordhorn J; Bockelbrink A; Berndt U; Willich SN; Koch M; Röcken C; Rindi G; Wiedenmann B
Cancer; 2008 Jul; 113(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 18506737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TNM: evolution and relation to other prognostic factors.
Sobin LH
Semin Surg Oncol; 2003; 21(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 12923909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stage classifications of pancreatic cancer: comparison of the Japanese and UICC classifications and proposal for a new staging system. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer.
Kawarada Y; Isaji S
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 9548664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The new TNM classification and staging of stomach cancer].
Hermanek P
Leber Magen Darm; 1989 Jul; 19(4):169-72, 175-9. PubMed ID: 2677567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative pathological examination of colorectal cancer.
Micev M; Cosic-Micev M; Todorovic V
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2000; 47(4 Suppl 1):67-76. PubMed ID: 11432246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Tumor classification--present status and further developments].
Hermanek P
Fortschr Med; 1989 Dec; 107(35):757-9. PubMed ID: 2691376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of gastric carcinoma.
Borchard F
Hepatogastroenterology; 1990 Apr; 37(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 2187787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification.
Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S
Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [New prognostic parameters and categories of colorectal carcinoma--correlation with standards].
Micev M; Cosić-Micev M; Krivokapić Z; Marković V; Popović M
Acta Chir Iugosl; 1998; 45(2 Suppl):61-8. PubMed ID: 10951790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TNM staging for malignancies of the digestive tract: 2003 changes and beyond.
Greene FL
Semin Surg Oncol; 2003; 21(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12923913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extended liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A comparison of the prognostic accuracy of the fifth and sixth editions of the TNM classification.
Jonas S; Thelen A; Benckert C; Biskup W; Neumann U; Rudolph B; Lopez-Häänninen E; Neuhaus P
Ann Surg; 2009 Feb; 249(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 19212186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Pancreatic cancer].
Tsuchiya R
Gan No Rinsho; 1986 Aug; 32(10):1362-4. PubMed ID: 3783968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image analysis of DNA cytometry in tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract].
Böttger TC; Gabbert H; Störkel S; Stöckle S
Med Klin (Munich); 1992 Jun; 87(6):293-9. PubMed ID: 1635518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between site N-category and number N-category for nodal staging in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: our experience and literature review.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Nigri G; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Ruzzetti R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal cell carcinoma 2005: new frontiers in staging, prognostication and targeted molecular therapy.
Lam JS; Shvarts O; Leppert JT; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1853-62. PubMed ID: 15879764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
