339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10470174)
21. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Megibow AJ; Zhou XH; Rotterdam H; Francis IR; Zerhouni EA; Balfe DM; Weinreb JC; Aisen A; Kuhlman J; Heiken JP
Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 7724748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HASTE MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas.
Fukukura Y; Fujiyoshi F; Sasaki M; Ichinari N; Inoue H; Kajiya Y; Nakajo M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 10096342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).
Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer H; Jakobs R; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Endoscopy; 1997 Oct; 29(8):741-4. PubMed ID: 9427493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison of fast and conventional half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath-hold turbo spin-echo, and respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequences.
Tang Y; Yamashita Y; Namimoto T; Abe Y; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):766-72. PubMed ID: 9169702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: combination of MR imaging, MR angiography and MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis and assessment of resectability.
Catalano C; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Scipioni A; Fanelli F; Brillo R; Passariello R
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 9510578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Right-lobe living related liver transplantation: evaluation of a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol for assessing potential donors.
Goyen M; Barkhausen J; Debatin JF; Kühl H; Bosk S; Testa G; Malago M; Ruehm SG
Liver Transpl; 2002 Mar; 8(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 11910569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Combined use of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography and contrast enhanced dual phase 3-D MR angiography in diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: initial clinical results].
Gaa J; Wendl K; Tesdal IK; Meier-Willersen HJ; Lehmann KJ; Böhm C; Möckel R; Richter A; Trede M; Georgi M
Rofo; 1999 Jun; 170(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 10420901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography.
Lopez Hänninen E; Amthauer H; Hosten N; Ricke J; Böhmig M; Langrehr J; Hintze R; Neuhaus P; Wiedenmann B; Rosewicz S; Felix R
Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 12091659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Combined conventional magnetic resonance, magnetic resonance angiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma].
Catalano C; Pavone P; Laghi A; Scipioni A; Assael F; Fanelli F; Grossi A; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):556-60. PubMed ID: 9280938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. MRCP and MRI findings in 9 patients with autoimmune pancreatitis.
Kamisawa T; Chen PY; Tu Y; Nakajima H; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 May; 12(18):2919-22. PubMed ID: 16718819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].
Mitake M; Okamura S; Ohashi S; Urano F; Simodaira M; Kanamori S; Ohyama I; Okada N; Segawa K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2885-9. PubMed ID: 9847615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): correlation with diagnosis using ERCP].
Lincender L; Vrcic D; Sadagic E; Vegar S; Mornjakovic A; Stevic N
Med Arh; 2002; 56(1 Suppl 1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12055719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bilio-pancreatic anomalies obscured with MRCP.
Bobek-Billewicz B; Gorycki T; Studniarek M; Szurowska E
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2002; 61(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11905251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Pancreas divisum: Diagnostic importance of MR cholangiopancreatography].
Yağmurlu B; Erden A; Erden I
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 14661601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Single shot fast spin echo sequence MRI cholangiopancreatography].
Lefèvre F; Crouzet P; Gaucher H; Chapuis F; Béot S; Boccaccini H; Bazin C; Régent D
J Radiol; 1998 May; 79(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9757270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.
Hekimoglu K; Ustundag Y; Dusak A; Erdem Z; Karademir B; Aydemir S; Gundogdu S
J Dig Dis; 2008 Aug; 9(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 18956595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
