These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10470626)

  • 1. Clinical assessment of malpractice case scenarios in an anesthesiology department.
    Liang BA
    J Clin Anesth; 1999 Jun; 11(4):267-79. PubMed ID: 10470626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.
    Kamath D; McIntyre S; Byerly S; Agarwal N; Kamath P; Peskin E; Gupta R; Roy S; Schwartz R; Kaye AD; Viswanath O; Urits I; Horn DB
    Pain Physician; 2020 Jul; 23(4):413-422. PubMed ID: 32709176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Layperson and physician perceptions of the malpractice system: implications for patient safety.
    Liang BA
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Jul; 57(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 12753823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing medical malpractice jury verdicts: a case study of an anesthesiology department.
    Liang BA
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 1997; 7(1):121-64. PubMed ID: 10182432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Juries and medical malpractice claims: empirical facts versus myths.
    Vidmar N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Feb; 467(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 19002541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicolegal Aspects of Iatrogenic Dysphonia and Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury.
    Ta JH; Liu YF; Krishna P
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Jan; 154(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 26419840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laryngology litigation in the United States: Thirty years in review.
    Song SA; Tolisano AM; Camacho M
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Oct; 126(10):2301-4. PubMed ID: 26763607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing loss resulting in malpractice litigation: what physicians need to know.
    Reilly BK; Horn GM; Sewell RK
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jan; 123(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22991223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical malpractice in California: res judicata.
    Barthel ER; Stabile BE; Plurad D; Kim D; Neville A; Bricker S; Putnam B; Bongard F
    Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 25264649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathology and medical malpractice. Academic and trainee empirical review of cases by State of Texas physicians.
    Allen TC; Stafford M; Liang BA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 141(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 24619750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Poor agreement among expert witnesses in bile duct injury malpractice litigation: an expert panel survey.
    de Reuver PR; Dijkgraaf MG; Gevers SK; Gouma DJ;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Nov; 248(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 18948809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anesthesia- and opioids-related malpractice claims following tonsillectomy in USA: LexisNexis claims database 1984-2012.
    Subramanyam R; Chidambaran V; Ding L; Myer CM; Sadhasivam S
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 24(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24417679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: literature review and role of the expert witness.
    Crosby E
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Mar; 54(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 17331936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.
    Daniels AH; Ruttiman R; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Brea BA; Palumbo MA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 28731391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dizziness, malpractice, and the otolaryngologist.
    Tolisano AM; Song SA; Ruhl DS; Littlefield PD
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2017; 38(4):401-404. PubMed ID: 28390810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of plaintiff and defense expert witness qualifications in malpractice litigation in anesthesiology.
    Radvansky BM; Farver WT; Svider PF; Eloy JA; Gubenko YA; Eloy JD
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Jun; 120(6):1369-74. PubMed ID: 25988639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rhinology and medical malpractice: An update of the medicolegal landscape of the last ten years.
    Tolisano AM; Justin GA; Ruhl DS; Cable BB
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Jan; 126(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 26256664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in expert opinion in medical malpractice review.
    Posner KL; Caplan RA; Cheney FW
    Anesthesiology; 1996 Nov; 85(5):1049-54. PubMed ID: 8916822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of standard of care and severity of injury on the resolution of medical malpractice claims.
    Taragin MI; Willett LR; Wilczek AP; Trout R; Carson JL
    Ann Intern Med; 1992 Nov; 117(9):780-4. PubMed ID: 1308760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: the crisis in medical malpractice.
    Epstein NE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2425-30. PubMed ID: 12435969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.