These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10470951)

  • 1. Comparison of interpretation of digitized images and screen-film radiographs.
    Keesling CA; Miller I; Taylor CN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):848-9. PubMed ID: 10470951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs.
    Youmans DC; Don S; Hildebolt C; Shackelford GD; Luker GD; McAlister WH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 9798889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ROC-study of a teleradiology workstation versus film readings.
    Størmer J; Bolle SR; Sund T; Weller GE; Gitlin JN
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 9059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital luminescence radiography (DLR) for skeletal diagnosis in traumatology].
    Müller RD; Buddenbrock B; Kock HJ; Voss M; John V; Bosch E; Schmidt G; Hirche H; Löhr E; Schmit-Neuerburg KP
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 1648758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new rare-earth screen for skeletal radiography.
    De Smet AA; Ritter EM; Fritz SL; Martin NL; Chang CH; Templeton AW
    Radiology; 1981 Nov; 141(2):542-3. PubMed ID: 7291587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M; Galanski M; Oestmann JW; von Falkenhausen U; Rosenthal H; Reimer P; Nischelsky J; Reichelt S
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital skeletal radiography.
    Pettersson H
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):43-4. PubMed ID: 7734539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Sommer A; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subtle orthopedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation.
    Scott WW; Rosenbaum JE; Ackerman SJ; Reichle RL; Magid D; Weller JC; Gitlin JN
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):811-5. PubMed ID: 8497636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
    Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns.
    Cohen MD; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA; White SJ; Smith JA; Long B
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical decision making using teleradiology in urology.
    Lee BR; Allaf M; Moore R; Bohlman M; Wang GM; Bishoff JT; Jackman SV; Cadeddu JA; Jarrett TW; Khazan R; Kavoussi LR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9888731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suspected infant abuse: radiographic skeletal survey practices in pediatric health care facilities.
    Kleinman PL; Kleinman PK; Savageau JA
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 15375226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations.
    Logan H; Daly L; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):237-40. PubMed ID: 2702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of diagnosis of subtle chest disease and subtle fractures with a teleradiology system.
    Larson A; Lynch DA; Zeligman B; Harlow C; Vanoni C; Thieme G; Kilcoyne R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9423590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
    Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.