These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10471263)

  • 1. Indecision over human pesticide data.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 1999 Sep; 5(9):972. PubMed ID: 10471263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toxicology. House would foil human pesticide studies.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2005 May; 308(5726):1234. PubMed ID: 15919959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EPA ponders pesticide tests in humans.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Jan; 283(5398):18-9. PubMed ID: 9917257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pesticide firms ask to use human data to assess safety.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):200-1. PubMed ID: 12529604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pesticide testing. EPA draft rules for human subjects draw fire.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):232. PubMed ID: 16002591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protection of human subjects in "third party" experiments.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Mar; 17(3):4. PubMed ID: 12408151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pesticide toxicity, human subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's dilemma.
    Robertson HG; Gorovitz S
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):427-58. PubMed ID: 10921235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of genetic modification of organisms: science or emotion?
    Malinowski MJ
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 11657280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plan to end genetics panel troubles EPA.
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5278):1035. PubMed ID: 11644823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critics claim even babies could be exposed to pesticides in research.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Aug; 20(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 16320460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
    Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
    Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychiatric guinea pigs are left in limbo.
    Boyce N
    New Sci; 1998 Nov; 160(2162):21. PubMed ID: 11660595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Universal protection for all human research participants.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11933953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agency proposes major expansion of its regulations for human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Oct; 20(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 16358477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US set to endorse human pesticide testing.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7055):24-5. PubMed ID: 16136104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On human experimentation.
    DeMarco D
    Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(4):48-60. PubMed ID: 11655592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Presidential National Bioethics Advisory Commission proposed.
    Crigger BJ
    IRB; 1994; 16(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11652792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NBAC recommendations on oversight of human subject research.
    Lo B; Groman M
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 12715803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In sickness and in health.
    Boyce N
    New Sci; 1997 Oct; 156(2105):20-1. PubMed ID: 11656695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can pesticide tests on humans ever meet standards for ethics?
    Begley S
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2003 Jan; ():B1. PubMed ID: 12653118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.