These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10472137)
21. The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's first decade. Chapman B J Gov Inf; 2000; 27(3):345-83. PubMed ID: 17886407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Risks and dangers of maritime traffic with boats with nuclear propulsion]. Pezzi G; Spena A Ann Med Nav (Roma); 1966; 71(4):467-88. PubMed ID: 5990963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The determination of the radio-contaminants in the pool-water of a reactor. Kostalas HA; Armiroitis J Health Phys; 1968 Jul; 15(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 5743764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Texas and nuclear power. Johnson PC Tex Med; 1973 Mar; 69(3):81-5. PubMed ID: 4690804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fast Breeder Reactors in Sweden: Vision and Reality. Fjaestad M Technol Cult; 2015 Jan; 56(1):86-114. PubMed ID: 26334698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Environmental surveillance at Los Alamos: an independent reassessment of historical data. Silver K; Clapp R Risk Anal; 2006 Aug; 26(4):893-906. PubMed ID: 16948684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chernobyl--opening the pages to scientific authors from Eastern Europe. Schaffner A Swiss Med Wkly; 2003 Sep; 133(35-36):473. PubMed ID: 14652801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A double diamond anniversary-Kyshtym and Windscale: the nuclear accidents of 1957. Wakeford R J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):E7-E13. PubMed ID: 28696335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Chalk River beta quartz fiber electroscope. Thomas RH Health Phys; 1993 Mar; 64(3):324. PubMed ID: 8432657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. B. John Garrick: nuclear risk assessment pioneer. Greenberg MR; Lowrie K Risk Anal; 2009 Jul; 29(7):935-9. PubMed ID: 19522779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Radioactivity in Harz area drinking water after Chernobyl]. Hennighausen RH Gesundheitswesen; 1999 Nov; 61(11):573-7. PubMed ID: 10628086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nuclear safety. Nuclear power plants and their fuel as terrorist targets. Chapin DM; Cohen KP; Davis WK; Kintner EE; Koch LJ; Landis JW; Levenson M; Mandil IH; Pate ZT; Rockwell T; Schriesheim A; Simpson JW; Squire A; Starr C; Stone HE; Taylor JJ; Todreas NE; Wolfe B; Zebroski EL Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5589):1997-9. PubMed ID: 12242425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Chernobyl disaster: cancer following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Hatch M; Ron E; Bouville A; Zablotska L; Howe G Epidemiol Rev; 2005; 27():56-66. PubMed ID: 15958427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Nuclear interlocking lies]. Kiefer B Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Mar; 7(287):680. PubMed ID: 21542387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Devastation in Japan. Current designs address safety problems in Fukushima reactors. Clery D Science; 2011 Mar; 331(6024):1506. PubMed ID: 21436413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of 50-y record of surface (137)Cs concentrations in the global ocean using the HAM-global database. Inomata Y; Aoyama M; Hirose K J Environ Monit; 2009 Jan; 11(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 19137147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A United States perspective on long-term management of areas contaminated with radioactive materials. Jones CR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):75-7. PubMed ID: 15238660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]