324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10472963)
1. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern.
Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Van Buskirk EM
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):571-81. PubMed ID: 10472963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Adams CW; Bullimore MA; Wall M; Fingeret M; Johnson CA
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):582-7. PubMed ID: 10472964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Tatemichi M; Nakano T; Tanaka K; Hayashi T; Nawa T; Miyamoto T; Hiro H; Iwasaki A; Sugita M;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Oct; 134(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 12383809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 16633218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection.
Horn FK; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 12566019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting conversion to glaucoma using standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology.
Takahashi G; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 255(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 28110356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency doubling perimetry in patients with mild and moderate pituitary tumor-associated visual field defects detected by conventional perimetry.
Monteiro ML; Moura FC; Cunha LP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 17589707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.
Horn FK; Scharch V; Mardin CY; Lämmer R; Kremers J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 26883356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
