149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10472975)
1. Osteometry of the mandible performed using dental MR imaging.
Nasel CJ; Pretterklieber M; Gahleitner A; Czerny C; Breitenseher M; Imhof H
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Aug; 20(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 10472975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the inferior alveolar canal for cysts and tumors of the mandible-comparison of multidetector computed tomography and 3-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance sequence with curved multiplanar reformatted reconstructions.
Srinivasan K; Seith A; Gadodia A; Sharma R; Kumar A; Roychoudhury A; Bhutia O
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2327-32. PubMed ID: 22265163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental MR tomography of the mandible.
Nasel C; Gahleitner A; Breitenseher M; Czerny C; Solar P; Imhof H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 9606395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR neurographic orthopantomogram: Ultrashort echo-time imaging of mandibular bone and teeth complemented with high-resolution morphological and functional MR neurography.
Manoliu A; Ho M; Nanz D; Dappa E; Boss A; Grodzki DM; Liu W; Chhabra A; Andreisek G; Kuhn FP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Aug; 44(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 26854879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of linear measurements before and after digitizing periapical and panoramic radiography images.
Langlois Cde O; Sampaio MC; Silva AE; Costa NP; Rockenbach MI
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22011897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of angular measurements and assessment of distortion in the mandibular third molar region on panoramic radiographs.
Dudhia R; Monsour PA; Savage NW; Wilson RJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Apr; 111(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 21420643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques.
Lindh C; Petersson A; Klinge B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Jun; 3(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 15900674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localization of the mandibular neurovascular bundle using dental magnetic resonance imaging.
Nasel C; Gahleitner A; Breitenseher M; Czerny C; Glaser C; Solar P; Imhof H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 9879221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lingual mandibular bony defects: CT in the buccolingual plane.
Slasky BS; Bar-Ziv J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(3):439-43. PubMed ID: 8626908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
Tal H; Moses O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of panoramic radiographs to measure alveolar bone areas.
Wilding RJ; Levin I; Pepper R
J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Nov; 14(6):557-67. PubMed ID: 3481395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT.
Kim KD; Jeong HG; Choi SH; Hwang EH; Park CS
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Apr; 23(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12710821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
Yang J; Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
