124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10473206)
1. Sensitivity of coefficients for converting entrance surface dose and kerma-area product to effective dose and energy imparted to the patient.
Wise KN; Sandborg M; Persliden J; Carlsson GA
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Aug; 44(8):1937-54. PubMed ID: 10473206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conversion factors of effective and equivalent organ doses with the air kerma area product in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions.
Brambilla M; Cannillo B; Matheoud R; Compagnone G; Rognoni A; Bongo AS; Carriero A
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():189-196. PubMed ID: 29173914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of conversion coefficients from measurable to risk quantities for external exposure over contaminated soil by use of physical human phantoms.
Golikov V; Wallström E; Wöhni T; Tanaka K; Endo S; Hoshi M
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2007 Nov; 46(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 17643259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the concept of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology.
Carlsson GA; Dance DR; Persliden J; Sandborg M
Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):39-62. PubMed ID: 10028627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 30452729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study.
Makri T; Yakoumakis E; Papadopoulou D; Gialousis G; Theodoropoulos V; Sandilos P; Georgiou E
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):5023-33. PubMed ID: 16985285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo study of the dependence of the KAP-meter calibration coefficient on beam aperture, x-ray tube voltage and reference plane.
Malusek A; Larsson JP; Carlsson GA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1157-70. PubMed ID: 17264377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DO THE BMI AND SURGEON INFLUENCE THE PATIENT DOSE IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED LUMBAR DISCECTOMY AND FUSION?☆.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Tzortzidis FN; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):472-482. PubMed ID: 30916774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulations in CT for the study of the surface air kerma and energy imparted to phantoms of varying size and position.
Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1439-54. PubMed ID: 15152684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CALDose_X-a software tool for the assessment of organ and tissue absorbed doses, effective dose and cancer risks in diagnostic radiology.
Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6437-59. PubMed ID: 18941276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of patient radiation dose from chest and lumbar spine X-ray examinations in 10 hospitals in Ghana.
Ofori EK; Antwi WK; Arthur L; Duah H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 21775316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms.
Omrane LB; Verhaegen F; Chahed N; Mtimet S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1809-24. PubMed ID: 12870585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Energy imparted and effective doses in computed tomography.
Atherton JV; Huda W
Med Phys; 1996 May; 23(5):735-41. PubMed ID: 8724747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
