BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10473206)

  • 21. Normalized dose data for upper gastrointestinal tract contrast studies performed to infants.
    Damilakis J; Stratakis J; Raissaki M; Perisinakis K; Kourbetis N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1033-40. PubMed ID: 16696480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EFFECTIVE DOSE PER UNIT KERMA-AREA PRODUCT CONVERSION FACTORS IN ADULTS UNDERGOING MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDIES.
    Bonilha HS; Wilmskoetter J; Tipnis SV; Martin-Harris B; Huda W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Nov; 176(3):269-277. PubMed ID: 28204745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
    Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine.
    Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in effective dose and energy imparted estimation from PA-AP, RLAT-LLAT projections in pediatric full spine x-ray examination using the Monte Carlo technique.
    Gialousis GI; Yakoumakis EN; Papadopoulou DI; Makri TK; Yakoumakis NE; Dimitriou PA; Georgiou EK
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16394339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetry of chest tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Månsson LG; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):144-52. PubMed ID: 20200101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal conversion coefficient from easily measurable dose to effective dose with consideration to radiation quality for posterior-anterior chest radiography.
    Ono K; Asada Y
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 38109792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Institutional (local) diagnostic reference levels in fluoroscopically guided spine surgery.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Tzortzidis FN; Konstantinou DT; Panayiotakis GS
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():50-59. PubMed ID: 28583647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effective dose and energy imparted in diagnostic radiology.
    Huda W; Gkanatsios NA
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9284255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Investigation of the entrance dose of standardized chest radiographs].
    Stieve FE; Gfirtner H; Jung EM; Schenk G
    Rofo; 2004 Jan; 176(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 14712415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of the VIP-Man model to calculate energy imparted and effective dose for x-ray examinations.
    Winslow M; Huda W; Xu XG; Chao TC; Shi CY; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM
    Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 14744051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incident air kerma to absorbed organ dose conversion factors for breast and lung in PA thorax radiography: The effect of patient thickness and radiation quality.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Vock P
    Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1594-1601. PubMed ID: 27914781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques.
    Jones NF; Palarm TW; Negus IS
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):920-5. PubMed ID: 11675309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
    Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spine computed tomography doses and cancer induction.
    Richards PJ; George J; Metelko M; Brown M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):430-3. PubMed ID: 20081559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dose distribution at radiographic examination of the spine in pediatric radiology.
    Almén AJ; Mattsson S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Mar; 21(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 8882699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 9127310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.