These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10474095)

  • 21. [X-ray cephalometric characteristic of face soft tissue profile in orthognatic bite].
    Zhulev EN; Marakhtanov NB
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2007; 86(4):67-70. PubMed ID: 17828100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The quadrilateral analysis: a differential diagnosis for surgical orthodontics.
    Di Paolo RJ; Philip C; Maganzini AL; Hirce JD
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 86(6):470-82. PubMed ID: 6594934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A cephalometric comparison of maxillary and mandibular incisor teeth position and soft tissue profile].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 2101665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Projecting the soft-tissue outcome of surgical and orthodontic manipulation of the maxillofacial skeleton.
    Kinnebrew MC; Hoffman DR; Carlton DM
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Dec; 84(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 6580823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Craniometric analysis of direct teleroentgenograms in patients with orthognatic bite].
    Trezubov VN; Arsent'eva AV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(6):66-9. PubMed ID: 17310955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. 3D dentofacial photogrammetry reference values: a novel approach to orthodontic diagnosis.
    Masoud MI; Bansal N; C Castillo J; Manosudprasit A; Allareddy V; Haghi A; Hawkins HC; Otárola-Castillo E
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28339510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A proportional analysis of the soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion.
    Lundström A; Forsberg CM; Peck S; McWilliam J
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(2):127-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 1626746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal Saudi population according to Steiner analysis.
    Al-Jasser NM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):746-50. PubMed ID: 11423887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and Cephalometric Analysis of Facial Soft Tissue.
    Oh J; Han JJ; Ryu SY; Oh HK; Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e431-e438. PubMed ID: 28538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 May; 125(5):571-81. PubMed ID: 15127026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Facial harmony in orthodontic diagnosis and planning.
    Paiva JB; Attizzani MF; Miasiro Júnior H; Rino Neto J
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 20339714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion.
    Godiawala RN; Joshi MR
    Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The aesthetic dentofacial analysis.
    Sarver D; Jacobson RS
    Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):369-94. PubMed ID: 17692698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cephalometric patterns of adults with normal occlusion.
    Christie TE
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Apr; 47(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 266384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences in dentofacial characteristics between southern versus northern Chinese adolescents.
    Gu Y; Hagg U; Wu J; Yeung S
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22372272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of the profile angle and the aesthetic analysis of the facial profile.
    Bass NM
    J Orthod; 2003 Mar; 30(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 12644600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.