These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10474095)
21. [X-ray cephalometric characteristic of face soft tissue profile in orthognatic bite]. Zhulev EN; Marakhtanov NB Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2007; 86(4):67-70. PubMed ID: 17828100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The quadrilateral analysis: a differential diagnosis for surgical orthodontics. Di Paolo RJ; Philip C; Maganzini AL; Hirce JD Am J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 86(6):470-82. PubMed ID: 6594934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [A cephalometric comparison of maxillary and mandibular incisor teeth position and soft tissue profile]. Seren E Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 2101665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Holdaway RA Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Projecting the soft-tissue outcome of surgical and orthodontic manipulation of the maxillofacial skeleton. Kinnebrew MC; Hoffman DR; Carlton DM Am J Orthod; 1983 Dec; 84(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 6580823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Craniometric analysis of direct teleroentgenograms in patients with orthognatic bite]. Trezubov VN; Arsent'eva AV Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(6):66-9. PubMed ID: 17310955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age. Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 3D dentofacial photogrammetry reference values: a novel approach to orthodontic diagnosis. Masoud MI; Bansal N; C Castillo J; Manosudprasit A; Allareddy V; Haghi A; Hawkins HC; Otárola-Castillo E Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28339510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A proportional analysis of the soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion. Lundström A; Forsberg CM; Peck S; McWilliam J Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(2):127-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 1626746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal Saudi population according to Steiner analysis. Al-Jasser NM Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):746-50. PubMed ID: 11423887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical and Cephalometric Analysis of Facial Soft Tissue. Oh J; Han JJ; Ryu SY; Oh HK; Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e431-e438. PubMed ID: 28538068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis. Halazonetis DJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 May; 125(5):571-81. PubMed ID: 15127026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion. Godiawala RN; Joshi MR Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]