101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10474096)
1. Evaluation of the consolidation period during osteodistraction using computed tomography.
Smith SW; Sachdeva RC; Cope JB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 10474096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mineralization dynamics of regenerate bone during mandibular osteodistraction.
Cope JB; Samchukov ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 30(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 11420907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distraction osteogenesis and histogenesis in beagle dogs: the effect of gradual mandibular osteodistraction on bone and gingiva.
Cope JB; Samchukov ML; Muirhead DE
J Periodontol; 2002 Mar; 73(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 11922256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regenerate bone formation and remodeling during mandibular osteodistraction.
Cope JB; Samchukov ML
Angle Orthod; 2000 Apr; 70(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 10832997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Guided Bone Regeneration Prevent Unfavorable Bone Shapes in Distraction Gap?
Demetoglu U; Alkan A; Kiliç E; Ozturk M; Bilge S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 76(3):631-638. PubMed ID: 28863881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distraction osteogenesis of the canine mandible: the impact of acute callus manipulation on vascularization and early bone formation.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 15635563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.
Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osteodistraction of mandibles with a small bone defect at the planned osteotomy site: a histological pilot study in dogs.
Zandi M; Dehghan A; Saleh M; Seyed Hoseini SR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e204-9. PubMed ID: 24113296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on bone formation during mandible distraction osteogenesis in a canine model--a preliminary study.
Ding Y; Li G; Zhang X; Ao J; Liu W; Ma Q; Liu Y; Liu B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2431-9. PubMed ID: 19837313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.
Nagashima LK; Rondon-Newby M; Zakhary IE; Nagy WW; Zapata U; Dechow PC; Opperman LA; Elsalanty ME
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21601342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of distraction rate and consolidation period on bone density following mandibular osteodistraction in rats.
King GJ; Liu ZJ; Wang LL; Chiu IY; Whelan MF; Huang GJ
Arch Oral Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 12663075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma on distraction osteogenesis in the mandible of rabbits: a morphologic and morphometric approach.
Bou Assi T; Rahme M; Saghieh S; Bou Raad Azoury N; Abdallah Hajj Hussein I; Leone A; Jurjus A
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2013; 27(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 23489697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microstructural and strength evaluation of regenerate tissue during the consolidation period after vertical mandibular ramus distraction.
Gomez DF; Sant'Anna EF; Leven RM; Ostric SA; Figueroa AA; Royston TJ; Sumner DR; Polley JW
J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 16(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 16192859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.
Roth DA; Gosain AK; McCarthy JG; Stracher MA; Lefton DR; Grayson BH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1237-47; discussion 1248-50. PubMed ID: 9105350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model].
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 May; 9(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 15856346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Pumping the regenerate": an evaluation of oscillating distraction osteogenesis in the rodent mandible.
Greenwald JA; Luchs JS; Mehrara BJ; Spector JA; Mackool RJ; McCarthy JG; Longaker MT
Ann Plast Surg; 2000 May; 44(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 10805303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tooth movement into distraction regenerate: when should we start?
El Sharaby FA; El Bokle NN; El Boghdadi DM; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):482-94. PubMed ID: 21457859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental tooth movement through regenerate alveolar bone: A pilot study.
Cope JB; Harper RP; Samchukov ML
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Nov; 116(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 10547507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
