149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10474150)
1. Ignorability and bias in clinical trials.
Heitjan DF
Stat Med; 1999 Sep 15-30; 18(17-18):2421-34. PubMed ID: 10474150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjusting for drop-out in clinical trials with repeated measures: design and analysis issues.
Wu MC; Albert PS; Wu BU
Stat Med; 2001 Jan; 20(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 11135350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conditional mixed models adjusting for non-ignorable drop-out with administrative censoring in longitudinal studies.
Li J; Schluchter MD
Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(22):3489-503. PubMed ID: 15505888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginalized transition models for longitudinal binary data with ignorable and non-ignorable drop-out.
Kurland BF; Heagerty PJ
Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2673-95. PubMed ID: 15316952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias reduction with an adjustment for participants' intent to dropout of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Leon AC; Demirtas H; Hedeker D
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 17942469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mixture gatekeeping procedure based on the Hommel test for clinical trial applications.
Brechenmacher T; Xu J; Dmitrienko A; Tamhane AC
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):748-67. PubMed ID: 21516567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the performance of random-coefficient pattern-mixture models for non-ignorable drop-out.
Demirtas H; Schafer JL
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(16):2553-75. PubMed ID: 12898544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Handling drop-out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches.
Lane P
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 17351897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A local sensitivity analysis approach to longitudinal non-Gaussian data with non-ignorable dropout.
Xie H
Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(16):3155-77. PubMed ID: 17948917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MMRM versus MI in dealing with missing data--a comparison based on 25 NDA data sets.
Siddiqui O
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):423-36. PubMed ID: 21442517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Second-order local sensitivity to non-ignorability in Bayesian inferences.
Eftekhari Mahabadi S
Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(25):3616-3636. PubMed ID: 29873097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An imputation method for non-ignorable missing data in studies of blood pressure.
Cook NR
Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(23):2713-28. PubMed ID: 9421871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.
DeSouza CM; Legedza AT; Sankoh AJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1055-73. PubMed ID: 20183464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of loss to follow-up on hypothesis tests of the treatment effect for several statistical methods in substance abuse clinical trials.
Hedden SL; Woolson RF; Carter RE; Palesch Y; Upadhyaya HP; Malcolm RJ
J Subst Abuse Treat; 2009 Jul; 37(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 19008067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of relative improvement due to weights within generalized estimating equations framework for incomplete clinical trials data.
Demirtas H
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):1085-98. PubMed ID: 15587981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
Potkin SG; Siu CO
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Correcting for the bias caused by drop-outs in hypertension trials.
Murray GD; Findlay JG
Stat Med; 1988 Sep; 7(9):941-6. PubMed ID: 3175393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the effect of multiple imputation on incomplete longitudinal data with application to a randomized clinical study.
Fong DY; Rai SN; Lam KS
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1004-22. PubMed ID: 23957512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A bias correction in testing treatment efficacy under informative dropout in clinical trials.
Kong F; Chen YF; Jin K
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):980-1000. PubMed ID: 20183460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
