These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10474281)

  • 1. Comparing the psychometric properties of preference-based and nonpreference-based health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group.
    Lalonde L; Clarke AE; Joseph L; Mackenzie T; Grover SA
    Qual Life Res; 1999 Aug; 8(5):399-409. PubMed ID: 10474281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional and chained standard gambles in the assessment of coronary heart disease prevention and treatment. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group.
    Lalonde L; Clarke AE; Joseph L; Grover SA
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 10231077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health-related quality of life in cardiac patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension.
    Lalonde L; O'Connor A; Joseph L; Grover SA;
    Qual Life Res; 2004 May; 13(4):793-804. PubMed ID: 15129889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health-related quality of life with coronary heart disease prevention and treatment.
    Lalonde L; Clarke AE; Joseph L; Mackenzie T; Grover SA;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):1011-8. PubMed ID: 11576812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Swedish population-based study on the relationship between the SF-36 and health utilities to measure health in hypertension.
    Bardage C; Isacson D; Ring L; Bingefors K
    Blood Press; 2003; 12(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 14596356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
    Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
    Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
    Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method?
    Goossens ME; Vlaeyen JW; Rutten-van Mölken MP; van der Linden SM
    Pain; 1999 Mar; 80(1-2):365-75. PubMed ID: 10204750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life.
    Revicki DA; Kaplan RM
    Qual Life Res; 1993 Dec; 2(6):477-87. PubMed ID: 8161982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valuation of scleroderma and psoriatic arthritis health states by the general public.
    Khanna D; Frech T; Khanna PP; Kaplan RM; Eckman MH; Hays RD; Ginsburg SS; Leonard AC; Tsevat J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Oct; 8():112. PubMed ID: 20920309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the standard gamble, rating scale, AQLQ and SF-36 for measuring quality of life in asthma.
    Juniper EF; Norman GR; Cox FM; Roberts JN
    Eur Respir J; 2001 Jul; 18(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 11510803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering.
    Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric Properties of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short-Form Survey (KDQOL-36) in the United States.
    Peipert JD; Bentler PM; Klicko K; Hays RD
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2018 Apr; 71(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 29128411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measuring preferences for depressive health states].
    König HH; Bernert S; Angermeyer MC
    Psychiatr Prax; 2005 Apr; 32(3):122-31. PubMed ID: 15818528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can health utility measures be used in lupus research? A comparative validation and reliability study of 4 utility indices.
    Moore AD; Clarke AE; Danoff DS; Joseph L; Bélisle P; Neville C; Fortin PR
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Jun; 26(6):1285-90. PubMed ID: 10381044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generic versus disease-specific health status measures. An example using coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure patients.
    Wolinsky FD; Wyrwich KW; Nienaber NA; Tierney WM
    Eval Health Prof; 1998 Jun; 21(2):216-43. PubMed ID: 10183345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.