These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10474989)
1. Confidentiality and privilege of physician peer review. Merideth PT J Miss State Med Assoc; 1999 Aug; 40(8):287-9. PubMed ID: 10474989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The peer review privilege: a law in search of a valid policy. Goldberg BA Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(2):151-67. PubMed ID: 6528878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Code of ethics of the Canadian Medical Association. Canadian Medical Association J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):123-5. PubMed ID: 11655377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [What is quality care?]. Niinistö L Duodecim; 1995; 111(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 8654257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Medical secrecy, privilege and privacy]. Witztum E; Margolin J; Levy A; Kron S Harefuah; 1994 May; 126(9):543-9. PubMed ID: 8034274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Professional Standards Review Organization: some problems of confidentiality. Springer EW Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):361-80. PubMed ID: 11658319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should there be a psychotherapist privilege in military courts-martial? Hayden DL Mil Law Rev; 1989; 123():31-107. PubMed ID: 11660232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The physician-patient privilege: the practical necessity of a written patient waiver. Biggs RA; Spell RL J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Apr; 31(4):127-30. PubMed ID: 2332891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review and professional ethics. Sullivan FW Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Feb; 134(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 835742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical privilege in the case of abused children. Henaghan M N Z Med J; 1985 Feb; 98(772):55-7. PubMed ID: 3856137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics in medicine and law--standards and conflicts. Norton ML Scapel Quill; 1977 Sep; 11(3):1-20. PubMed ID: 11662516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidentiality, privilege, and responsibility legal and ethical problems. Perles J N Y State J Med; 1965 Oct; 65(20):2608-16. PubMed ID: 5213353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidentiality and the physician-patient relationship -- ethical reflections from a surgical waiting room. Clark PA Med Sci Monit; 2002 Nov; 8(11):SR31-4. PubMed ID: 12444393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [About patient's rights]. Vacarezza R Rev Med Chil; 2000 Dec; 128(12):1380-4. PubMed ID: 11227249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review: a secret affair? Dunn LJ Trustee; 1978 Apr; 31(4):9-11, 13. PubMed ID: 10307158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical privacy: threatened but fighting back. Patient Care; 1975 Jan; 9(1):108-109+. PubMed ID: 11661198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidentiality of peer review. Battaglia VF Del Med J; 1999 Mar; 71(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 10208062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies. Greeson TW; McClure DJ Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]