BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10475840)

  • 1. E-publication proposal.
    Marchesi V
    Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5430):1013-4. PubMed ID: 10475840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. E-publication proposal.
    Baum H
    Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5430):1014. PubMed ID: 10475841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomedical research publication system.
    Wang YL; Burridge K; Dembo M; Gabbiani G; Hanks SK; Hosoya H; Janmey P; Karlsson R; Lindberg U; Mabuchi I; Otey C; Rottner K; Small JV; Wang CL; Zigmond S
    Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5666):1974-6. PubMed ID: 15044785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "E-biomed" and clinical research.
    Bell C; Ruskin K
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Sep; 341(14):1080-1; author reply 1081. PubMed ID: 10507926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing scientific publishing.
    Raff MC; Stevens CF; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Newsome WT
    Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):945-6. PubMed ID: 15310878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. E-biomed.
    Homan JM
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1999 Oct; 87(4):485-6. PubMed ID: 10550036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A challenge for scientific medical journals: quest for the holy p-pub/e-pub balance.
    Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Apr; 39(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 16580406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
    Randleman JB
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internet and scientific publishing.
    van Mil F
    Pharm World Sci; 2003 Dec; 25(6):243. PubMed ID: 14689809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "E-biomed" and clinical research.
    Ammann AJ
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Sep; 341(14):1080; author reply 1081. PubMed ID: 10507924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review, unmasked.
    Gura T
    Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6878):258-60. PubMed ID: 11907547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Crisis of the scientific communication].
    Ramel B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(37):3514-8. PubMed ID: 14531352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The youth team.
    Chen J
    Nature; 2001 May; 411(6833):13-4. PubMed ID: 11333946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
    Liu SV
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PNAS joins peer-reviewed PubMed Central. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):733. PubMed ID: 10548089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.