These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10476200)
1. Assessing the practicality of research findings for clinical practice. Girard N Semin Perioper Nurs; 1999 Jan; 8(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 10476200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles. Froman RD; Schmitt MH Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals. Parent N; Hanley JA Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article? Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A critique of Michael L. Millenson's book, Demanding medical excellence: doctors and accountability in the information age, and its relevance to CRNAs and nursing. Gunn IP AANA J; 1998 Dec; 66(6):575-82. PubMed ID: 10488264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information sources for developing the nursing literature. Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK; Wilmes NA; Denison D; Webb SA; Featherston DE; Bednarz H; Striz P Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):580-7. PubMed ID: 17145059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review of nursing research proposals. Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining components of the research process needed to conduct and critique studies. Summers S J Post Anesth Nurs; 1991 Feb; 6(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 2046040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissemination of research in clinical nursing journals. Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK; Wilmes NA; Denison D; Webb SA; Featherston DE; Bednarz H; Striz P; Blair DA; Kowalewski K J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18171391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this? Koop PP Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Critiquing research for use in practice. Dale JC J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical reading. Price A; Price B Mod Midwife; 1996 Jul; 6(7):26-9. PubMed ID: 8852186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applying research to practice. Practical guidelines for occupational health nurses. Salazar MK AAOHN J; 2002 Nov; 50(11):520-5; quiz 526-7. PubMed ID: 12465209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to critique qualitative research articles. Forchuk C; Roberts J Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(4):47-55; quiz 56. PubMed ID: 10603806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reading and utilizing quantitative nursing research: a guide for the neophyte. Ryan M J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1996 Sep; 27(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 9060720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Access to and use of research by rural nurses. Winters CA; Lee HJ; Besel J; Strand A; Echeverri R; Jorgensen KP; Dea JE Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):758. PubMed ID: 17892348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical appraisal. How to decide if review articles are trustworthy and relevant for practice. Cullum N NT Learn Curve; 1999 Aug; 3(6):4-6. PubMed ID: 10795232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]