BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10476329)

  • 21. The right to privacy of medical records: balancing competing expectations.
    Glover J; Toll E
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 2002; 79(4):540-5, 553, 556. PubMed ID: 15732198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Treating the troops.
    Howe EG; Martin ED
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(2):21-4; discussion 24-9. PubMed ID: 2045278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brave new world: the privacy threat that didn't go away.
    Scarf M
    New Repub; 1999 Jul; 221(2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11660734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The medical records maze: a construct of federal inaction and state inconsistency.
    Knepper K
    J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 10186236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Protecting privacy.
    Lewis T
    Am Med News; 1980 Mar; 23(9):3, 10. PubMed ID: 10245663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flawed US proposals on patients' privacy.
    Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9081):823. PubMed ID: 9310593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Privacy, protected information, & research.
    IRB; 2002; 24(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 14509293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Blood rights: the body and information privacy.
    Alston B
    J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):426-40. PubMed ID: 15957586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Privacy legislation and health care.
    Bickle J; Appleby M
    Health Law Can; 2001 May; 21(4):85-90. PubMed ID: 11414068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medical records privacy gets new push.
    Szabo J
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Feb; 32(2):18. PubMed ID: 10787886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response.
    Boyer BB
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Confidentiality as an organizational ethics issue.
    Hall R
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 10693048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. HIPAA and health information privacy rules: almost there.
    Hellerstein D
    Health Manag Technol; 2000 Apr; 21(4):26, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 11066924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New duties for the sentinels.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(5):2. PubMed ID: 8002302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health care information and privacy.
    Shalala DE
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 10182218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medical records. Enhancing privacy, preserving the common good.
    Etzioni A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 10321335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maintaining informed consent for doctor-patient confidentiality: more serious failings in the HHS medical regulations.
    Sobel R
    J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 14682371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New privacy rule has more tasks for IRBs.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):4. PubMed ID: 12530379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Privacy regulations revert to HHS while Congress works on other issues.
    Levin-Epstein M
    Manag Care; 1999 Oct; 8(10):27-8. PubMed ID: 10661947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.