These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10476513)

  • 1. Material properties of ophthalmic sutures after sterilization and disinfection.
    Shuttleworth GN; Vaughn LF; Hoh HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Sep; 25(9):1270-4. PubMed ID: 10476513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of saline conditions on the tensile strength of ophthalmic sutures.
    Brauner SC; Berry JL; Pye J; Lee EG; Rhee DJ
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21117584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.
    Hennessey DB; Carey E; Simms CK; Hanly A; Winter DC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():168-73. PubMed ID: 22762905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.
    Abiri A; Paydar O; Tao A; LaRocca M; Liu K; Genovese B; Candler R; Grundfest WS; Dutson EP
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3258-3270. PubMed ID: 27928670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of physical properties of three suture materials: silk, e-PTFE (Gore-Tex), and PLA/PGA (Vicryl).
    Charbit Y; Hitzig C; Bolla M; Bitton C; Bertrand MF
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 10067182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of a new polypropylene suture with Prolene.
    Chu CC; Pratt L; Zhang L; Hsu A; Chu A
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 10148624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thrombogenicity of different suture materials as revealed by scanning electron microscopy.
    Dahlke H; Dociu N; Thurau K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 7364788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unique performance characteristics of Novafil.
    Rodeheaver GT; Borzelleca DC; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Mar; 164(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 3547720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
    Tanaka Y; Sadahiro S; Ishikawa K; Suzuki T; Kamijo A; Tazume S; Yasuda M
    Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study on the mechanical properties of sutures in the process of suturing].
    Zhang L; Dai A; Li W; Zhou Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 36(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31232540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suture choice matters in rabbit model of laparoscopic, preperitoneal, inguinal hernia repair.
    Kelly KB; Krpata DM; Blatnik JA; Ponsky TA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 24784781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experiments on suture material prolene 10-0 and vicryl 11-0 compared with nylon 10-0 in the rabbit cornea (author's transl)].
    Faulborn J; Theopold H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1977 Apr; 170(4):605-13. PubMed ID: 886803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats.
    Sheynkin YR; Li PS; Magid ML; Carlson D; Chen EC; Goldstein M
    Urology; 1999 Jun; 53(6):1235-8. PubMed ID: 10367861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacterial Colonization on Different Suture Materials Used in Oral Implantology: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nadafpour N; Montazeri M; Moradi M; Ahmadzadeh S; Etemadi A
    Front Dent; 2021; 18():25. PubMed ID: 35965706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
    Bariol SV; Stewart GD; Tolley DA
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.
    Lawrence TM; Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):836-41. PubMed ID: 16039381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elastic behaviour of sutured calf pericardium: influence of the suture threads.
    García Páez JM; Carrera San Martin A; García Sestafe JV; Jorge Herrero E; Navidad R; Cordón A; Castillo-Olivares JL
    Biomaterials; 1996 Sep; 17(17):1677-83. PubMed ID: 8866029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery.
    Matalia J; Panmand P; Ghalla P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):661-664. PubMed ID: 29676310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of surgical suture materials using dynamic mechanical analysis.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Sichina WJ
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(10):715-20. PubMed ID: 1420718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.