These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10477092)

  • 1. Full-size digitized mammography will probably be a major step forward in breast imaging.
    Vanel D
    Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 31(1):1. PubMed ID: 10477092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New, accurate 3-D imaging may prevent breast biopsies.
    Telemed Virtual Real; 1998 Mar; 3(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 10183403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variable Appearances of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Digital Mammography, Synthesized Mammography, and Tomosynthesis: A Pictorial Essay.
    Hwang E; Szabo J; Sonnenblick EB; Margolies LR
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Feb; 69(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 28947267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Image quality and radiation exposure in mass mammography examinations: a report from the Survey Group for Institutional Evaluation].
    Suzuki R; Horita K; Asahara M; Koyama S; Sanada S; Terada H; Nishitani M; Ishikawa M; Wakamaru A; Kurowarabi K; Negishi T;
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 12881688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of wavelet analysis for contrast enhancement in mammography.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Cavouras D; Bezerianos A; Panayiotakis G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():502-6. PubMed ID: 10179716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms.
    Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9419517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography.
    Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Sakellaropoulos P; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):410-20. PubMed ID: 10844867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of cancerous masses for screening mammography using discrete wavelet transform-based multiresolution Markov random field.
    Zheng L; Chan AK; McCord G; Wu S; Liu JS
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10342157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems.
    Baldelli P; Bertolini M; Contillo A; Della Gala G; Golinelli P; Pagan L; Rivetti S; Taibi A
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(16):165020. PubMed ID: 29972144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting.
    Spuur K; Webb J; Poulos A; Nielsen S; Robinson W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Mar; 100():76-84. PubMed ID: 29496083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Nawano S
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):67-9. PubMed ID: 7734543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Imaging of the Breast: Is a Synthetic View Better?
    Jenks S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 27038116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jan; 198(1):240. PubMed ID: 22194503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.
    Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 11055788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast calcifications: analysis of imaging properties.
    Olson SL; Fam BW; Winter PF; Scholz FJ; Lee AK; Gordon SE
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3174980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.