These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10477092)

  • 21. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A study of image processing in CR mammography; gradation processing].
    Muramatsu Y; Nawano S; Anan M; Hanmura K; Tanaka T; Matsue H; Yamada T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Feb; 35(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 2325289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom.
    Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammography visual enhancement in CAD-based breast cancer diagnosis.
    Wang H; Li JB; Wu L; Gao H
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 23465979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees AV
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
    Adler DD; Wahl RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of x-ray diffraction enhanced imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Liu C; Yan X; Zhang X; Yang W; Peng W; Shi D; Zhu P; Huang W; Yuan Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 17202624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consistency of lesion size in digital mammography.
    Clunie DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):W257; author reply W258. PubMed ID: 20729426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography.
    Paquelet JR; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W115-8. PubMed ID: 20028882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of microcalcifications segmentation techniques for dense breast digitized images.
    Góes CE; Schiabel H; Nunes FL
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():231-3. PubMed ID: 12105737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 24450669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital mammography: an update.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms.
    Fam BW; Olson SL; Winter PF; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 3174981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.