200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10478061)
1. Critical appraisal. 4. Questioning evidence: its validity and importance.
Thompson C
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jun; 3(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10478061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
Higgins PA; Straub AJ
Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical appraisal. How to decide if review articles are trustworthy and relevant for practice.
Cullum N
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Aug; 3(6):4-6. PubMed ID: 10795232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 2.
Haughey BP
Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 7712803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating research: what it means to you.
Maklebust J; Margolis DJ
Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
Evans D; Kowanko I
Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical appraisal. Finding and appraising cohort studies for causation and prognosis.
Cullum N
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Sep; 3(7):8-10. PubMed ID: 10795223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A critical approach to evidence provided through clinical trials.
Shaw S
Nurs Times; 2006 Sep 5-11; 102(36):36-8. PubMed ID: 16986593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Are we in Kansas yet, Toto?" The construction of chronic illness in research.
Paterson BL
Can J Nurs Res; 2000 Dec; 32(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 11928129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Using an evidence-based approach to critical appraisal.
D'Auria JP
J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(5):343-6. PubMed ID: 17825735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sifting evidence.
Renshaw M; Strachan H; Tomlinson D
Nurs Times; 1999 Sep 22-28; 95(38):26-7. PubMed ID: 10734893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy fields--grounded in reality?
Esposito L
Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1998 Apr; 8(8):3. PubMed ID: 10542707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
Buckman R
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing critical appraisal skills.
McCaughan D
Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 10603895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-informed midwifery. 2. Using research in midwifery practice.
Wickham S
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (52):39-41. PubMed ID: 11051985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the evidence for evidence-based practice?
Groh CJ
Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2005 Apr; 19(2):102-3. PubMed ID: 15902680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Sep; 10(8):329-31. PubMed ID: 12964336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Critiquing research for use in practice.
Dale JC
J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
Nelson EA
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86.
Rolfe G
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
