203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10478237)
21. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis.
Kinkel K; Lu Y; Both M; Warren RS; Thoeni RF
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):748-56. PubMed ID: 12202709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Kurtz AB; Tsimikas JV; Tempany CM; Hamper UM; Arger PH; Bree RL; Wechsler RJ; Francis IR; Kuhlman JE; Siegelman ES; Mitchell DG; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Sheth S; Coleman BG; Ellis JH; Kurman RJ; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10405715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endometrial carcinoma: multisection dynamic MR imaging using a three-dimensional FLASH technique during breath holding.
Joja I; Asakawa T; Shiraiwa M; Shibutani O; Okuno K; Akaki S; Togami I; Kudo T; Hiraki Y
Radiat Med; 1999; 17(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 10440110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: comparison with imaging at 1.5 T.
Hori M; Kim T; Murakami T; Imaoka I; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Nakaya Y; Tomoda K; Tsutsui T; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Nakamura H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):621-30. PubMed ID: 19711413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Staging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging.
Frei KA; Kinkel K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jun; 13(6):850-5. PubMed ID: 11382943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of MR imaging for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma.
Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Mar; 104(3):654-9. PubMed ID: 17095081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Non-small cell lung cancer staging: efficacy comparison of integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T whole-body MR imaging.
Yi CA; Shin KM; Lee KS; Kim BT; Kim H; Kwon OJ; Choi JY; Chung MJ
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):632-42. PubMed ID: 18552311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by progesterone-challenge test, CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging, PET scan and intraoperative visual evaluation and Frozen section].
Ivanov C
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2009; 48(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 20225491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US.
King AD; Tse GM; Ahuja AT; Yuen EH; Vlantis AC; To EW; van Hasselt AC
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 14990838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Magnetic resonance (MR) in endometrial carcinoma preoperative evaluation].
Wiesenfeld U; Cova M; De Lazslo P; Tinelli A; Mangino F; Grimaldi E; Guaschino S
Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Oct; 53(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 11549999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes.
Pandharipande PV; Choy G; del Carmen MG; Gazelle GS; Russell AH; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):802-14. PubMed ID: 19234280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Value of MRI in the assessment of invasion depth by endometrial carcinoma].
Wang LX; Ouyang H; Wu LY; Lian SD; Wang S; Zhou CW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 May; 28(5):373-6. PubMed ID: 17045005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity of intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Mavromatis ID; Antonopoulos CN; Matsoukis IL; Frangos CC; Skalkidou A; Creatsas G; Petridou ET
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jul; 91(7):779-93. PubMed ID: 22452291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial carcinoma.
Peungjesada S; Bhosale PR; Balachandran A; Iyer RB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 19638859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative vascular evaluation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Huang J; Chen M; Jiao LR
Pancreatology; 2012; 12(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 22687378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the extent of endometrial carcinoma].
Takahashi K; Yoshioka M; Kosuge H; Iizuka Y; Musha T; Yamauchi I; Yoshimura Y; Nakamura Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Jul; 47(7):647-54. PubMed ID: 7636336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.
Ortashi O; Jain S; Emannuel O; Henry R; Wood A; Evans J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 17537566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
