162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10478770)
1. Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbar spine.
Hawk C; Phongphua C; Bleecker J; Swank L; Lopez D; Rubley T
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1999; 22(6):382-9. PubMed ID: 10478770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.
French SD; Green S; Forbes A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 10820295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality: Part II.
Boline PD; Haas M; Meyer JJ; Kassak K; Nelson C; Keating JC
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993; 16(6):363-74. PubMed ID: 8409784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.
Hestbaek L; Leboeuf-Yde C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):258-75. PubMed ID: 10820299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test.
Meijne W; van Neerbos K; Aufdemkampe G; van der Wurff P
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1999 Jan; 22(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 10029942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of lumbar motion palpation.
Panzer DM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Oct; 15(8):518-24. PubMed ID: 1402412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness.
Hubka MJ; Phelan SP
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994; 17(9):591-5. PubMed ID: 7884328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior disk displacement: morphologic assessment and measurement reliability-lumbar spine.
Cooley JR; Danielson CD; Schultz GD; Hall TA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jun; 24(5):317-26. PubMed ID: 11416821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality.
Keating JC; Bergmann TF; Jacobs GE; Finer BA; Larson K
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 Oct; 13(8):463-70. PubMed ID: 2146357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra- and interobserver reliability of passive motion palpation of the lumbar spine.
Mootz RD; Keating JC; Kontz HP; Milus TB; Jacobs GE
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Dec; 12(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 2628523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The interrater reliability of static palpation of the thoracic spine for eliciting tenderness and stiffness to test for a manipulable lesion.
Beynon AM; Hebert JJ; Walker BF
Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():49. PubMed ID: 30524705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interexaminer reliability of the electromagnetic radiation receiver for determining lumbar spinal joint dysfunction in subjects with low back pain.
Gemmell HA; Jacobson BH; Edwards SW; Heng BJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 2140122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and Reliability of Palpatory Clinical Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Mobility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ribeiro RP; Guerrero FG; Camargo EN; Beraldo LM; Candotti CT
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 May; 44(4):307-318. PubMed ID: 33896601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method.
Kilpikoski S; Airaksinen O; Kankaanpää M; Leminen P; Videman T; Alen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):E207-14. PubMed ID: 11935120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard'.
Humphreys BK; Delahaye M; Peterson CK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2004 Jun; 5():19. PubMed ID: 15198806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected impaired motor control of the lumbar spine.
Murphy DR; Byfield D; McCarthy P; Humphreys K; Gregory AA; Rochon R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 16762665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interexaminer Reliability of Seated Motion Palpation for the Stiffest Spinal Site.
Holt K; Russell D; Cooperstein R; Young M; Sherson M; Haavik H
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 Sep; 41(7):571-579. PubMed ID: 30449306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intertester agreement and validity of identifying lumbar pain provocative movement patterns using active and passive accessory movement tests.
Hidalgo B; Hall T; Nielens H; Detrembleur C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014 Feb; 37(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24401656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of the chiropractic biophysics lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure.
Troyanovich SJ; Robertson GA; Harrison DD; Holland B
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):519-24. PubMed ID: 8583174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
