These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10479420)

  • 1. Quantification of Spatial Correlation in Porous Media and Its Effect on Mercury Porosimetry.
    Bryant S; Mason G; Mellor D
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1996 Jan; 177(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 10479420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetization evolution in network models of porous rock under conditions of drainage and imbibition.
    Chang D; Ioannidis MA
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Sep; 253(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 16290842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of Macroscopic Structural Disorder in Porous Media Using Mercury Porosimetry.
    Rigby SP; Fletcher RS; Riley SN
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2001 Aug; 240(1):190-210. PubMed ID: 11446801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of mercury porosimetry, assisted by nitrogen adsorption in the investigation of the pore structure of tablets].
    Szepes A; Kovács J; Szabóné Revész P
    Acta Pharm Hung; 2006; 76(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 17094658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ionic Diffusivity, Electrical Conductivity, Membrane and Thermoelectric Potentials in Colloids and Granular Porous Media: A Unified Model.
    Revil A
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Apr; 212(2):503-522. PubMed ID: 10092382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of mercury contact angle, surface tension, and retraction mechanism on the interpretation of mercury porosimetry data.
    Rigby SP; Edler KJ
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Jun; 250(1):175-90. PubMed ID: 16290649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining mercury thermoporometry with integrated gas sorption and mercury porosimetry to improve accuracy of pore-size distributions for disordered solids.
    Bafarawa B; Nepryahin A; Ji L; Holt EM; Wang J; Rigby SP
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2014 Jul; 426():72-9. PubMed ID: 24863767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geometric and Topological Analysis of Three-Dimensional Porous Media: Pore Space Partitioning Based on Morphological Skeletonization.
    Liang Z; Ioannidis MA; Chatzis I
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Jan; 221(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10623448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Geometry and Topology of 3D Stochastic Porous Media.
    Ioannidis MA; Chatzis I
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Sep; 229(2):323-334. PubMed ID: 10985811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of nonwetting phase entrapment within porous media using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Watt-Smith MJ; Rigby SP; Chudek JA; Fletcher RS
    Langmuir; 2006 May; 22(11):5180-8. PubMed ID: 16700611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling liquid porosimetry in modeled and imaged 3-D fibrous microstructures.
    Jaganathan S; Vahedi Tafreshi H; Pourdeyhimi B
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Oct; 326(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 18684465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pore size distribution in tablets measured with a morphological sieve.
    Wu YS; van Vliet LJ; Frijlink HW; van der Voort Maarschalk K
    Int J Pharm; 2007 Sep; 342(1-2):176-83. PubMed ID: 17580106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracking colloid transport in porous media using discrete flow fields and sensitivity of simulated colloid deposition to space discretization.
    Li Z; Zhang D; Li X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(4):1274-80. PubMed ID: 20088544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mercury porosimetry in mesoporous glasses: a comparison of experiments with results from a molecular model.
    Porcheron F; Thommes M; Ahmad R; Monson PA
    Langmuir; 2007 Mar; 23(6):3372-80. PubMed ID: 17305379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-flowpath model for the interpretation of immiscible displacement experiments in heterogeneous soil columns.
    Aggelopoulos CA; Tsakiroglou CD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 105(3-4):146-60. PubMed ID: 19178982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical analysis of electroosmotic flow in dense regular and random arrays of impermeable, nonconducting spheres.
    Hlushkou D; Seidel-Morgenstern A; Tallarek U
    Langmuir; 2005 Jun; 21(13):6097-112. PubMed ID: 15952866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the distribution of consolidants and interpretation of mercury porosimetry data in a sandstone porous network using LSCM.
    Zoghlami K; Gómez-Gras D
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Dec; 65(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 15662619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AFM-porosimetry: density and pore volume measurements of particulate materials.
    Sörensen MH; Valle-Delgado JJ; Corkery RW; Rutland MW; Alberius PC
    Langmuir; 2008 Jun; 24(13):7024-30. PubMed ID: 18503284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsteady-State Flow of Flexible Polymers in Porous Media.
    Zitha PL; Chauveteau G; Léger L
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2001 Feb; 234(2):269-283. PubMed ID: 11161513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mercury cyclic porosimetry: Measuring pore-size distributions corrected for both pore-space accessivity and contact-angle hysteresis.
    Gu Z; Goulet R; Levitz P; Ihiawakrim D; Ersen O; Bazant MZ
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2021 Oct; 599():255-261. PubMed ID: 33945972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.