These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10480813)

  • 1. UK watchdog issues guidelines to combat medical research fraud.
    Jones J
    BMJ; 1999 Sep; 319(7211):660. PubMed ID: 10480813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Call for research misconduct agency.
    White C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
    Williams N
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
    Farthing MJ
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
    Goldbeck-Wood S
    BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
    Farthing MJ
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
    Chantler C; Chantler S
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Causes, investigation and prevention. A report of the Royal College of Physicians.
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1991 Apr; 25(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2066936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud.
    Williams N
    Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1221. PubMed ID: 9411745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time to face up to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
    Wells F
    Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misconduct in research: editors respond.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):201-2. PubMed ID: 9253258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Committee on Publication Ethics. The COPE Report 1999. Guidelines on good publication practice.
    Ann Trop Paediatr; 2000 Jun; 20(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 10945056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.
    Lock S
    BMJ; 1995 Jun; 310(6994):1547-8. PubMed ID: 7787632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dealing with editorial misconduct.
    Godlee F
    BMJ; 2004 Dec; 329(7478):1301-2. PubMed ID: 15576718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.