These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10481722)

  • 41. Influence of the way results are presented on research interpretation and medical decision making: the PRIMER collaboration randomized studies.
    Shakespeare TP; Gebski V; Tang J; Lim K; Lu JJ; Zhang X; Jiang G
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 18083993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Application of repeated-measures analysis of variance and hierarchical linear model in nursing research.
    Shin JH
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19448525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Incontinence research studies: methodologic issues.
    Burns PA
    Urol Nurs; 1994 Sep; 14(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 7732411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Exploratory data analysis. Part II: Steps in examining data.
    Lederman RP
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1993; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 8423739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Preparing and presenting a research poster.
    Wipke-Tevis DD; Williams DA
    J Vasc Nurs; 2002 Dec; 20(4):138-42. PubMed ID: 12469074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Statistical power and neonatal nursing research statistics: knowing your "p" from your "SD".
    Holditch-Davis D
    Neonatal Netw; 1990 Sep; 9(2):62-3. PubMed ID: 2392117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Statistical process control in nursing research.
    Polit DF; Chaboyer W
    Res Nurs Health; 2012 Feb; 35(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 22095634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Response to: Watson's guest editorial, 'Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research', Journal of Advanced Nursing (2003) 43, pp. 219-220, and subsequent JAN forum pieces, 44, pp. 546-548.
    Paley J
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 May; 46(4):453-4. PubMed ID: 15117356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Taking note of trends in age groupings.
    Becker PT
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Dec; 33(6):475-6. PubMed ID: 20890949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A response to: "Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers' by G.R. Williamson (2003) Journal of Advanced Nursing 44, 278-288, from Seamus Cowman and Ronan M. Conroy.
    Cowman S; Conroy RM
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Apr; 46(2):221-2; author reply 222-3. PubMed ID: 15056337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How to avoid the pitfalls of questionnaire design.
    McGibbon G
    Nurs Times; 1997 May 7-13; 93(19):49-51. PubMed ID: 9188438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Appropriate application of statistical analysis method in medical science and technology articles].
    Gou L; Yu J; Yang Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 19(11):925-7. PubMed ID: 16334245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Survey and research (9). Steps in the survey research process for nursing practice: statistics (3)].
    Kawaguchi T
    Kango Kenkyu; 1997; 30(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 9348854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Research methodology. Part III: understanding multiple correlation analysis and multiple regression.
    Beard MT; Edwards KA; Curry EL; Johnson MN; Marshall D
    ABNF J; 1995; 6(6):143-8. PubMed ID: 8714921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Research paradigms and methods for investigating holistic nursing concerns.
    Hagedorn ME; Zahourek RP
    Nurs Clin North Am; 2007 Jun; 42(2):335-53, viii. PubMed ID: 17544686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Missing data: an introductory conceptual overview for the novice researcher.
    El-Masri MM; Fox-Wasylyshyn SM
    Can J Nurs Res; 2005 Dec; 37(4):156-71. PubMed ID: 16541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Descriptive analysis of research data.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1998 May; 46(5):266-7. PubMed ID: 9652241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reading research critically: statistical significance.
    Giuffre M
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1994 Dec; 9(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 7707264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Understanding statistical hypothesis testing.
    Ren D
    J Emerg Nurs; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 19203687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reading research critically: results--Part 1.
    Giuffre M
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Jun; 10(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 7783027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.