These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10481815)
1. Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis. Ioannidis JP; Lau J Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):462-9. PubMed ID: 10481815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold? Papageorgiou SN J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. Ioannidis JP J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis: when and how. Imperiale TF Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies. Engberg S J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews. Harris JD; Brand JC; Cote MP; Dhawan A Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1594-1602. PubMed ID: 28457677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. Jadad AR; McQuay HJ J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8606325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The case for failed meta-analyses. Naylor CD J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9238567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses. Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis: a critical appraisal of the methodology, benefits and drawbacks. Khan S; Memon B; Memon MA Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2019 Nov; 80(11):636-641. PubMed ID: 31707891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis. Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [How to read a meta-analysis?]. Moulis G; Sommet A Rev Med Interne; 2014 Apr; 35(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24029290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data]. Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):820-6. PubMed ID: 9382404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]