139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10482083)
1. Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities.
Björkgren MA; Häkkinen U; Finne-Soveri UH; Fries BE
Scand J Public Health; 1999 Sep; 27(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 10482083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. RUG-III and resource allocation: comparing the relationship of direct care time with patient characteristics in five countries.
Carpenter GI; Ikegami N; Ljunggren G; Carrillo E; Fries BE
Age Ageing; 1997 Sep; 26 Suppl 2():61-5. PubMed ID: 9464557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The RUG-III case mix classification system for long-term care nursing facilities: is it adequate for nurse staffing?
Mueller C
J Nurs Adm; 2000 Nov; 30(11):535-43. PubMed ID: 11098253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Case-mix classification in post-acute and long-term care. Validation of Resource Utilization Groups III (RUG-III) in the Czech Republic].
Topinková E; Neuwirth J; Mellanová A; Stanková M; Haas T
Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Feb; 139(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 10802930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III).
Fries BE; Schneider DP; Foley WJ; Gavazzi M; Burke R; Cornelius E
Med Care; 1994 Jul; 32(7):668-85. PubMed ID: 8028403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case-mix classification of Medicare residents in skilled nursing facilities: resource utilization groups (RUG-T18).
Fries BE; Schneider DP; Foley WJ; Dowling M
Med Care; 1989 Sep; 27(9):843-58. PubMed ID: 2505002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying RUG-III in Japanese long-term care facilities.
Ikegami N; Fries BE; Takagi Y; Ikeda S; Ibe T
Gerontologist; 1994 Oct; 34(5):628-39. PubMed ID: 7959131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. RUG-III for exploring the association between staffing levels and cost-efficiency in nursing facility care in Finland.
Laine J
Health Care Manage Rev; 2006; 31(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 16493275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of registered nursing care of residents in English nursing homes using the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) and Resource Utilisation Groups version III (RUG-III).
Carpenter I; Perry M; Challis D; Hope K
Age Ageing; 2003 May; 32(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12720613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the RUG-III classification system for understanding the resource intensity of persons with intellectual disability residing in nursing homes.
Martin L; Fries BE; Hirdes JP; James M
J Intellect Disabil; 2011 Jun; 15(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 21750215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation and use of resource utilization groups as a case-mix measure for long-term care.
Cooney LM; Fries BE
Med Care; 1985 Feb; 23(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 3919223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the RUG-III resident classification system for skilled nursing facilities.
White C; Pizer SD; White AJ
Health Care Financ Rev; 2002; 24(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 12690692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applying Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Hong Kong nursing homes.
Chou KL; Chi I; Leung JC
Can J Aging; 2008; 27(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 19158040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of functional independence measure-function related groups and resource utilization groups-version III systems across post acute settings.
Eilertsen TB; Kramer AM; Schlenker RE; Hrincevich CA
Med Care; 1998 May; 36(5):695-705. PubMed ID: 9596060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Creating a MEDPAR (Medicare provider analysis and review) analog to the RUG-III (Resource Utilization Groups, Version III) classification system.
Cornelius E; Feldman J; Marsteller JA; Liu K
Health Care Financ Rev; 1994; 16(2):101-26. PubMed ID: 10142367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) system as a staffing tool in nursing homes.
Dellefield ME
Geriatr Nurs; 2006; 27(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16757387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [On the feasibility of a RUG-III based payment system for long-term care facilities in Korea].
Kim EK; Park HY; Kim CY
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Apr; 34(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 15314323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Case-mix and resource use in long-term care.
Cameron JM
Med Care; 1985 Apr; 23(4):296-309. PubMed ID: 3921783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nursing home case-mix instruments: validation of the RUG-III system in Italy.
Brizioli E; Bernabei R; Grechi F; Masera F; Landi F; Bandinelli S; Cavazzini C; Gangemi S; Ferrucci L
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2003 Jun; 15(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14582687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III).
Francesconi P; Cantini E; Bavazzano E; Lauretani F; Bandinelli S; Buiatti E; Ferrucci L
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2006 Apr; 18(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16702782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
