These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10483390)

  • 1. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.
    Mitchell CA; Douglas WH; Cheng YS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10483390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Lee JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10668033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro.
    Robertello FJ; Coffey JP; Lynde TA; King P
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 10424980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements.
    Pereira JR; Rosa RA; Só MV; Afonso D; Kuga MC; Honório HM; Valle AL; Vidotti HA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 25004052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements.
    Li ZC; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 10220666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns.
    Mitchell CA; Abbariki M; Orr JF
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 10762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capsulated versus hand-mixed glass-ionomer luting cements for post retention.
    Mitchell CA; Orr JF; Russell MD
    J Dent; 1998 Jan; 26(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 9479925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Dispensing/Mixing Methods on Mechanical Properties.
    Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Altitinchi A; Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):E158-E165. PubMed ID: 29570021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements.
    Saskalauskaite E; Tam LE; McComb D
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 18086139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements.
    Yoshida K; Tanagawa M; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9610856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):482-7. PubMed ID: 11203860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compressive properties of chemically cured, resin modified glass ionomer luting cements.
    Huget EF
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1998 Apr; 78(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 9800556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ratio and powder particle size reduction on fracture toughness.
    Mitsuhashi A; Hanaoka K; Teranaka T
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):747-57. PubMed ID: 14511733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements.
    Gorodovsky S; Zidan O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 1501173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement.
    de Araújo DF; Chaves LP; Bim O; Pimentel Garcia FC; Ishikiriama SK; Honório HM; Wang L
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 24613604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.