These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10483398)

  • 21. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.
    Moshaverinia M; Navas A; Jahedmanesh N; Shah KC; Moshaverinia A; Ansari S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 31326149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water.
    Cattani-Lorente MA; Godin C; Meyer JM
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jan; 10(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 7995474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
    Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failure behavior of glass ionomer cement under Hertzian indentation.
    Wang Y; Darvell BW
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1223-9. PubMed ID: 18359073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flexural properties of resin-modified "hybrid" glass-ionomers in comparison with conventional acid-base glass-ionomers.
    Momoi Y; Hirosaki K; Kohno A; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater J; 1995 Dec; 14(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 8940550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of a self-adhesive coating on the load-bearing capacity of tooth-coloured restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Palamara J; Mese A; Manton DJ
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Mar; 62(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27224424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison study on the flexural strength and compressive strength of four resin-modified luting glass ionomer cements.
    Li Y; Lin H; Zheng G; Zhang X; Xu Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S9-17. PubMed ID: 26406090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents.
    Zoergiebel J; Ilie N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):619-26. PubMed ID: 22549662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Dent Mater; 1996 May; 12(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 9002858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements.
    Saskalauskaite E; Tam LE; McComb D
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 18086139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of APF Minute-Foam on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of high-viscosity glass ionomers.
    García-Godoy F; García-Godoy A; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12762603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva.
    Musanje L; Shu M; Darvell BW
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 11445206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin.
    Zoergiebel J; Ilie N
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Dec; 9(12):9529-37. PubMed ID: 23954325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
    Burrow MF; Nopnakeepong U; Phrukkanon S
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flexural strength and modulus of a novel ceramic restorative cement intended for posterior restorations as determined by a three-point bending test.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Peutzfeldt A; van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2003 Apr; 61(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 12790505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Water sorption and solubility of resin-modified polyalkenoate cements.
    Yap A; Lee CM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 24(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 9147305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers.
    Mitra SB; Kedrowski BL
    Dent Mater; 1994 Mar; 10(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 7758852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Properties of a proline-containing glass ionomer dental cement.
    Ansari S; Moshaverinia M; Roohpour N; Chee WW; Schricker SR; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 23998626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.