189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10483527)
1. MCDOCK: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem.
Liu M; Wang S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1999 Sep; 13(5):435-51. PubMed ID: 10483527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QXP: powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design.
McMartin C; Bohacek RS
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1997 Jul; 11(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 9334900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural basis of binding of high-affinity ligands to protein kinase C: prediction of the binding modes through a new molecular dynamics method and evaluation by site-directed mutagenesis.
Pak Y; Enyedy IJ; Varady J; Kung JW; Lorenzo PS; Blumberg PM; Wang S
J Med Chem; 2001 May; 44(11):1690-701. PubMed ID: 11356104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A QXP-based multistep docking procedure for accurate prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
Alisaraie L; Haller LA; Fels G
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1174-87. PubMed ID: 16711737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities.
Frimurer TM; Peters GH; Iversen LF; Andersen HS; Møller NP; Olsen OH
Biophys J; 2003 Apr; 84(4):2273-81. PubMed ID: 12668436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations.
Rohs R; Bloch I; Sklenar H; Shakked Z
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(22):7048-57. PubMed ID: 16352865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Docking flexible ligands to macromolecular receptors by molecular shape.
DesJarlais RL; Sheridan RP; Dixon JS; Kuntz ID; Venkataraghavan R
J Med Chem; 1986 Nov; 29(11):2149-53. PubMed ID: 3783576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment and challenges of ligand docking into comparative models of G-protein coupled receptors.
Nguyen ED; Norn C; Frimurer TM; Meiler J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67302. PubMed ID: 23844000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Middle-way flexible docking: Pose prediction using mixed-resolution Monte Carlo in estrogen receptor α.
Spiriti J; Subramanian SR; Palli R; Wu M; Zuckerman DM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215694. PubMed ID: 31013302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.
Davis IW; Baker D
J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 19041878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.
Gill SC; Lim NM; Grinaway PB; Rustenburg AS; Fass J; Ross GA; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(21):5579-5598. PubMed ID: 29486559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo on the manifold and MD refinement for binding pose prediction of protein-ligand complexes: 2017 D3R Grand Challenge.
Ignatov M; Liu C; Alekseenko A; Sun Z; Padhorny D; Kotelnikov S; Kazennov A; Grebenkin I; Kholodov Y; Kolosvari I; Perez A; Dill K; Kozakov D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 30421350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo replica-exchange based ensemble docking of protein conformations.
Zhang Z; Ehmann U; Zacharias M
Proteins; 2017 May; 85(5):924-937. PubMed ID: 28168752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the multi-objective optimization replica exchange Monte Carlo enhanced sampling method for protein-small molecule docking.
Wang H; Liu H; Cai L; Wang C; Lv Q
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):327. PubMed ID: 28693470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
Huang SY; Zou X
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heteroligation of a mouse monoclonal IgE antibody (La2) with small molecules, analysed by computer-aided automated docking.
Sotriffer CA; Liedl KR; Winger RH; Gamper AM; Kroemer RT; Linthicum DS; Rode BM; Varga JM
Mol Immunol; 1996 Feb; 33(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 8649435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site.
Wei BQ; Weaver LH; Ferrari AM; Matthews BW; Shoichet BK
J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 337(5):1161-82. PubMed ID: 15046985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP.
Zacharias M
Proteins; 2004 Mar; 54(4):759-67. PubMed ID: 14997571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
