169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10483818)
1. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients.
Taylor AE; Olver IN; Sivanthan T; Chi M; Purnell C
Support Care Cancer; 1999 Sep; 7(5):332-5. PubMed ID: 10483818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Functionality Assessment Flowchart (FAF): a new simple and reliable method to measure performance status with a high percentage of agreement between observers.
Paiva CE; Siquelli FA; Santos HA; Costa MM; Massaro DR; Lacerda DC; Nunes JS; de Pádua Souza C; Paiva BS
BMC Cancer; 2015 Jul; 15():501. PubMed ID: 26142726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution.
Buccheri G; Ferrigno D; Tamburini M
Eur J Cancer; 1996 Jun; 32A(7):1135-41. PubMed ID: 8758243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scales.
Roila F; Lupattelli M; Sassi M; Basurto C; Bracarda S; Picciafuoco M; Boschetti E; Milella G; Ballatori E; Tonato M
Ann Oncol; 1991 Jun; 2(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 1768630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients.
Zimmermann C; Burman D; Bandukwala S; Seccareccia D; Kaya E; Bryson J; Rodin G; Lo C
Support Care Cancer; 2010 May; 18(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 19629537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status.
Jang RW; Caraiscos VB; Swami N; Banerjee S; Mak E; Kaya E; Rodin G; Bryson J; Ridley JZ; Le LW; Zimmermann C
J Oncol Pract; 2014 Sep; 10(5):e335-41. PubMed ID: 25118208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools.
de Kock I; Mirhosseini M; Lau F; Thai V; Downing M; Quan H; Lesperance M; Yang J
J Palliat Care; 2013; 29(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 24380215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance status assessment in cancer patients.
Conill C; Verger E; Salamero M
Cancer; 1990 Apr; 65(8):1864-6. PubMed ID: 2317765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Karnofsky performance status be transformed to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scoring scale and vice versa?
Verger E; Salamero M; Conill C
Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28A(8-9):1328-30. PubMed ID: 1515244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interconversion of two commonly used performance tools: An analysis of 5844 paired assessments in 1501 lung cancer patients.
Prasad KT; Kaur H; Muthu V; Aggarwal AN; Behera D; Singh N
World J Clin Oncol; 2018 Nov; 9(7):140-147. PubMed ID: 30425939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-rater reliability of a modified Karnofsky Scale of Performance Status for HIV-infected individuals.
Fantoni M; Izzi I; Del Borgo C; Del Forno A; Damiano F; Pezzotti P; Franzetti M; Negri C; Quirini T; Zambelli A
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 1999 Jan; 13(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11362083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interconversion of three measures of performance status: an empirical analysis.
Ma C; Bandukwala S; Burman D; Bryson J; Seccareccia D; Banerjee S; Myers J; Rodin G; Dudgeon D; Zimmermann C
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 46(18):3175-83. PubMed ID: 20674334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The palliative performance scale: examining its inter-rater reliability in an outpatient palliative radiation oncology clinic.
Campos S; Zhang L; Sinclair E; Tsao M; Barnes EA; Danjoux C; Sahgal A; Goh P; Culleton S; Mitera G; Chow E
Support Care Cancer; 2009 Jun; 17(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 18946683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals.
Azam F; Latif MF; Farooq A; Tirmazy SH; AlShahrani S; Bashir S; Bukhari N
Case Rep Oncol; 2019; 12(3):728-736. PubMed ID: 31616281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among health care professionals: a systematic review.
Chow R; Chiu N; Bruera E; Krishnan M; Chiu L; Lam H; DeAngelis C; Pulenzas N; Vuong S; Chow E
Ann Palliat Med; 2016 Apr; 5(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 27121736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver variability of grading scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Degen LA; Dorhout Mees SM; Algra A; Rinkel GJ
Stroke; 2011 Jun; 42(6):1546-9. PubMed ID: 21527761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment between clinicians and patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chow R; Zimmermann C; Bruera E; Temel J; Im J; Lock M
BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2020 Jun; 10(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 31806655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating correlation and interrater reliability for four performance scales in the palliative care setting.
Myers J; Gardiner K; Harris K; Lilien T; Bennett M; Chow E; Selby D; Zhang L
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2010 Feb; 39(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 20152588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study.
Sørensen JB; Klee M; Palshof T; Hansen HH
Br J Cancer; 1993 Apr; 67(4):773-5. PubMed ID: 8471434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool: preliminary development and evaluation for use in palliative care.
Kaasa T; Loomis J; Gillis K; Bruera E; Hanson J
J Pain Symptom Manage; 1997 Jan; 13(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 9029857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
