BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10484218)

  • 1. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.
    Varghese JC; Farrell MA; Courtney G; Osborne H; Murray FE; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Aug; 54(8):513-20. PubMed ID: 10484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
    Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
    Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
    Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
    Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
    Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
    Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
    Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
    Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
    Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease].
    Iannicelli E; Sessa B; Argnani L; Galluzzo A; David V
    Clin Ter; 2006; 157(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 17147050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
    Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up.
    Katz LH; Benjaminov O; Belinki A; Geler A; Braun M; Knizhnik M; Aizner S; Shaharabani E; Sulkes J; Shabtai E; Pappo O; Atar E; Tur-Kaspa R; Mor E; Ben-Ari Z
    Clin Transplant; 2010; 24(5):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21039885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
    Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Messina A; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Passariello R
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8797971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Single shot fast spin echo sequence MRI cholangiopancreatography].
    Lefèvre F; Crouzet P; Gaucher H; Chapuis F; Béot S; Boccaccini H; Bazin C; Régent D
    J Radiol; 1998 May; 79(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9757270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
    Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Soto JA; Barish MA; Yucel EK; Siegenberg D; Ferrucci JT; Chuttani R
    Gastroenterology; 1996 Feb; 110(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 8566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
    Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.