These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10485003)

  • 1. Comparative learning theory and its application in the training of horses.
    Cooper JJ
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 1998 Nov; (27):39-43. PubMed ID: 10485003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Training methods for horses: habituation to a frightening stimulus.
    Christensen JW; Rundgren M; Olsson K
    Equine Vet J; 2006 Sep; 38(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 16986605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equine learning behaviour.
    Murphy J; Arkins S
    Behav Processes; 2007 Sep; 76(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 17400403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A conditioned reinforcer did not help to maintain an operant conditioning in the absence of a primary reinforcer in horses.
    Lansade L; Calandreau L
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jan; 146():61-63. PubMed ID: 29158027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the addition of positive reinforcement for learning a frightening task: a pilot study with horses.
    Heleski C; Bauson L; Bello N
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2008; 11(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 18569217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying learning theory to the management of the horse: the difference between getting it right and getting it wrong.
    Mills DS
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 1998 Nov; (27):44-8. PubMed ID: 10485004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential outcome effect in the horse.
    Miyashita Y; Nakajima S; Imada H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 11029025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overshadowing: a silver lining to a dark cloud in horse training.
    McLean AN
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2008; 11(3):236-48. PubMed ID: 18569221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing pawing in horses using positive reinforcement.
    Fox AE; Belding DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 26282112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement as a mediator of the perception of humans by horses (Equus caballus).
    Sankey C; Richard-Yris MA; Henry S; Fureix C; Nassur F; Hausberger M
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Sep; 13(5):753-64. PubMed ID: 20490592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques.
    Goodwin D; McGreevy P; Waran N; McLean A
    Vet J; 2009 Jul; 181(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19394880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of conditioned reinforcement frequency in an intermittent free-feeding situation.
    Zimmerman J; Hanford PV; Brown W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Jul; 10(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 6033554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using differential reinforcement to improve equine welfare: shaping appropriate truck loading and feet handling.
    Slater C; Dymond S
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 21310219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction of biting and chewing of horses using differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Fox AE; Bailey SR; Hall EG; St Peter CC
    Behav Processes; 2012 Sep; 91(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 22617186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary reinforcement property of a stimulus paired with morphine administration in the rat.
    Numan R; Banerjee U; Smith N; Lal H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1976 Oct; 5(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 1005488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.
    Dougherty DM; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 1940765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial reinforcement and conditioned taste aversion: No evidence for resistance to extinction.
    Dwyer DM; Gasalla P; López M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 28649917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training reinforcement rates, resistance to extinction, and the role of context in reinstatement.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Bensemann J; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2016 Mar; 44(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 26139290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.