117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10485239)
1. Detection of small peripheral lung cancer by digital chest radiography. Performance of unprocessed versus unsharp mask-processed images.
Yang ZG; Sone S; Li F; Takashima S; Maruyama Y; Hasegawa M; Hanamura K; Asakura K
Acta Radiol; 1999 Sep; 40(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 10485239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lung nodule conspicuity using unsharp mask filters with storage-phosphor-based computed radiography.
Li F; Sone S; Kiyono K
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 9059410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Ide K; Mogami H; Murakami T; Yasuhara Y; Miyagawa M; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2007 Jun; 25(5):195-201. PubMed ID: 17581707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Oestmann JW; Galanski M
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance.
Sherrier RH; Chiles C; Wilkinson WE; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 3336719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.
Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H
Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital image processing to remove blur from linear tomography of the lung.
Sone S; Kasuga T; Sakai F; Izuno I; Oguchi M
Acta Radiol; 1991 Sep; 32(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 1911000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-filtered image post-processing of digital luminescence radiographs in pulmonary nodule imaging.
Müller RD; Von Koschitzki T; Hirche H; John V; Hering K; Gocke C; Turowski B
Clin Radiol; 1996 Aug; 51(8):577-86. PubMed ID: 8761397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital tomosynthesis of the thorax: the influence of respiratory motion artifacts on lung nodule detection.
Kim SM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Kang H; Song IY; Lee EJ; Hwang HS
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 23528563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal subtraction for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: evaluation of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system.
Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Tsubamoto M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Saki H; Fujiwara K
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):806-11. PubMed ID: 12034953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of low-dose helical CT as a second step after plain chest radiography for mass screening for lung cancer.
Mori K; Tominaga K; Hirose T; Sasagawa M; Yokoyama K; Moriyama N
J Thorac Imaging; 1997 Jul; 12(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9249674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancement and compression of digital chest radiographs.
Cohn M; Trefler M; Young TY
J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 2299708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of temporal subtraction technique on the diagnosis of primary lung cancer with chest radiography.
Matsuda T; Yasuhara Y; Kano A; Mochizuki T; Ikezoe J
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 12868859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
