These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10486043)

  • 1. Validity of Performance Criteria and a Tentative Model for Regulatory Use in Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Permitting.
    Breaux A; Serefiddin F
    Environ Manage; 1999 Oct; 24(3):327-336. PubMed ID: 10486043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA.
    Breaux A; Cochrane S; Evens J; Martindale M; Pavlik B; Suer L; Benner D
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Feb; 74(3):217-37. PubMed ID: 15644262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review and Comparison of Wetland Impacts and Mitigation Requirements Between New Jersey, USA, Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
    Torok LS; Lockwood S; Fanz D
    Environ Manage; 1996 Sep; 20(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 8703111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research: The Effect of Wetland Mitigation Banking on the Achievement of No-Net-Loss.
    BROWN PH; LANT CL
    Environ Manage; 1999 Apr; 23(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 9950696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program.
    BenDor T; Sholtes J; Doyle MW
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2078-92. PubMed ID: 20014580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA.
    Sudol MF; Ambrose RF
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 12375092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance with wetland mitigation standards in the upper peninsula of Michigan, USA.
    Kozich AT; Halvorsen KE
    Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 50(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 22543680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new approach for hydrologic performance standards in wetland mitigation.
    Sueltenfuss JP; Cooper DJ
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():1154-1163. PubMed ID: 30602240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wetland mitigation compliance in the western upper peninsula of Michigan.
    Hornyak MM; Halvorsen KE
    Environ Manage; 2003 Nov; 32(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 15015692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoration of a Canadian Prairie Wetland with Agricultural and Municipal Wastewater.
    White JS; Bayley SE
    Environ Manage; 1999 Jul; 24(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 10341060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of spatial and temporal patterns in compensatory wetland mitigation.
    BenDor T; Brozović N
    Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):349-64. PubMed ID: 17602255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RESEARCH: Evaluating Sustainability of Watershed Resources Management Through Wetland Functional Analysis.
    Zalidis GC; Gerakis A
    Environ Manage; 1999 Sep; 24(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 10384029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Optimization Model for a Wetland Restoration Project under Uncertainty.
    Cai B; Zhang Y; Wang X; Li Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30544647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soil development and establishment of carbon-based properties in created freshwater marshes.
    Hossler K; Bouchard V
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Mar; 20(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 20405805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands.
    Matthews JW; Endress AG
    Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 41(1):130-41. PubMed ID: 17676406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Assessment of Long-Term Compliance with Performance Standards in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands.
    Van den Bosch K; Matthews JW
    Environ Manage; 2017 Apr; 59(4):546-556. PubMed ID: 27981354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986-1999.
    Cole CA; Shafer D
    Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):508-15. PubMed ID: 12481917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a market in wetland credits: entrepreneurial wetland banking in Chicago.
    Robertson M; Hayden N
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):636-46. PubMed ID: 18577091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina: an evaluation of regulatory success.
    Hill T; Kulz E; Munoz B; Dorney JR
    Environ Manage; 2013 May; 51(5):1077-91. PubMed ID: 23515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining water quality effects of riparian wetland loss and restoration scenarios in a southern ontario watershed.
    Yang W; Liu Y; Ou C; Gabor S
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 174():26-34. PubMed ID: 26989942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.