These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10487148)

  • 41. A Comparison of Responses to Substantive Transition Prompts in Interviews With Children.
    Earhart B; Danby MC; Brubacher SP; Powell MB; Sharman S
    Child Maltreat; 2018 Aug; 23(3):221-225. PubMed ID: 29466881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. When do children exhibit a "yes" bias?
    Okanda M; Itakura S
    Child Dev; 2010; 81(2):568-80. PubMed ID: 20438461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Source-monitoring training facilitates preschoolers' eyewitness memory performance.
    Thierry KL; Spence MJ
    Dev Psychol; 2002 May; 38(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 12005385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview.
    McCauley MR; Fisher RP
    J Appl Psychol; 1995 Aug; 80(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 7642461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Eyewitness recall and suggestibility in individuals with Down syndrome.
    Collins D; Henry L
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Dec; 60(12):1227-1231. PubMed ID: 27381963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of the eyewitness accounts of deaf and hearing children.
    Porter S; Yuille JC; Bent A
    Child Abuse Negl; 1995 Jan; 19(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 7895144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Eyewitness memory and suggestibility in children with mental retardation.
    Henry LA; Gudjonsson GH
    Am J Ment Retard; 1999 Nov; 104(6):491-508. PubMed ID: 10587731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Do young children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias.
    Fritzley VH; Lee K
    Child Dev; 2003; 74(5):1297-313. PubMed ID: 14552399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The utility of direct questions in eliciting subjective content from children disclosing sexual abuse.
    Stolzenberg SN; Williams S; McWilliams K; Liang C; Lyon TD
    Child Abuse Negl; 2021 Jun; 116(Pt 1):103964. PubMed ID: 30952365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Idiosyncratic effects of interviewer behavior on the accuracy of children's responses.
    Najafichaghabouri M; Joslyn PR; Preston E
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Mar; 57(2):463-472. PubMed ID: 38404176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of Delay, Question Type, and Socioemotional Support on Episodic Memory Retrieval by Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Almeida TS; Lamb ME; Weisblatt EJ
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):1111-1130. PubMed ID: 30406912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can rapport building strategies, age, and question type influence preschoolers' disclosures of adult wrongdoing?
    Magnusson M; Ernberg E; Landström S; Joleby M; Akehurst L
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 61(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 32052875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interviewing witnesses: the effect of forced confabulation on event memory.
    Pezdek K; Sperry K; Owens SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):463-78. PubMed ID: 17245633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Productivity of Wh- Prompts in Child Forensic Interviews.
    Ahern EC; Andrews SJ; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Jul; 33(13):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 26668179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of age and delay on responses to repeated questions in forensic interviews with children alleging sexual abuse.
    Andrews SJ; Lamb ME
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 24341834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Recall Accuracy in Children: Age vs. Conceptual Thinking.
    Murnikov V; Kask K
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():686904. PubMed ID: 34447332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The NICHD investigative interview protocol: an analogue study.
    Brown DA; Lamb ME; Lewis C; Pipe ME; Orbach Y; Wolfman M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):367-82. PubMed ID: 24341318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Adults usually believe young children: the influence of eliciting questions and suggestibility presentations on perceptions of children's disclosures.
    Laimon RL; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):489-501. PubMed ID: 18236143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Effects of Practice on Children's Ability to Apply Ground Rules in a Narrative Interview.
    Danby MC; Brubacher SP; Sharman SJ; Powell MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):446-58. PubMed ID: 26294382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Children's performance on ground rules questions: implications for forensic interviewing.
    Dickinson JJ; Brubacher SP; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 25642973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.