These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10487628)

  • 21. Reducing the burden of glandular carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Herzog TJ; Monk BJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 18060938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Epidemiology of cervical cancer in Taiwan.
    Wang PD; Lin RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 8812531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incidence, mortality, and prognostic factors of small cell carcinoma of the cervix.
    Chen J; Macdonald OK; Gaffney DK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1394-402. PubMed ID: 18515524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry.
    Pettersson F; Näslund I; Malker B
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Epidemiology of cervical invasive cancer in the Gerona health area in 1980-1989. Cancer registry of Gerona].
    Garrido Victoria S; Font Angel I; Fabregat Miguel B; Quemada Pau V
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 1997; 71(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Prevalence of cervical adenocarcinoma in Finland].
    Nieminen P; Kallio M; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 1995; 111(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 8681844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
    Znaor A; Strnad M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
    Day NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Characteristics of uterine cancer detected by mass screening].
    Igarashi T; Konno R; Sato S; Yajima A
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1519-26. PubMed ID: 9725043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.
    Aklimunnessa K; Mori M; Khan MM; Sakauchi F; Kubo T; Fujino Y; Suzuki S; Tokudome S; Tamakoshi A; ; Motohashi Y; Tsuji I; Nakamura Y; Iso H; Mikami H; Inaba Y; Hoshiyama Y; Suzuki H; Shimizu H; Toyoshima H; Wakai K; Ito Y; Hashimoto S; Kikuchi S; Koizumi A; Kawamura T; Watanabe Y; Miki T; Date C; Sakata K; Nose T; Hayakawa N; Yoshimura T; Shibata A; Okamoto N; Shino H; Ohno Y; Kitagawa T; Kuroki T; Tajima K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 36(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 16844732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changing incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in East Anglia.
    Stockton D; Cooper P; Lonsdale RN
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9200062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lung cancer incidence rates by histologic type: an example of trends in Eastern Europe--Slovakia 1978-95.
    Plesko I; Severi G; Obsitníková A; Boyle P; Kubík A
    Neoplasma; 2001; 48(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 11712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Etiologic heterogeneity for cervical carcinoma by histopathologic type, using comparative age-period-cohort models.
    Reimers LL; Anderson WF; Rosenberg PS; Henson DE; Castle PE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):792-800. PubMed ID: 19258470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Socioeconomic differences in incidence of cervical cancer in Finland by cell type.
    Pukkala E; Malila N; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20001504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recent trends in recorded incidence and mortality from uterine cancer.
    Gallagher RP; Elwood JM
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1982; 62():83-7. PubMed ID: 7167199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
    Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among Tunisian women.
    Missaoui N; Trabelsi A; Landolsi H; Jaidaine L; Mokni M; Korbi S; Hmissa S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(3):777-80. PubMed ID: 21039053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Burden of invasive cervical cancer in North Carolina.
    Denslow SA; Knop G; Klaus C; Brewer NT; Rao C; Smith JS
    Prev Med; 2012; 54(3-4):270-6. PubMed ID: 22342290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recent trends in uterine cervix cancer in Slovakia, 1968-1987.
    Vlasák V; Plesko I; Dimitrova E; Hudáková G
    Neoplasma; 1991; 38(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 1956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Epidemiology of cervical carcinoma in Brunei Darussalam. Analysis of data on 27,208 women screened with cytologic examinations.
    Affandi MZ; Dun T; Mantuano V; Sidhu R; Lumplugh C; Telisinghe PU
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 8465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.