BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10488461)

  • 1. [The Nucleus Double Array Cochlear Implant: a new concept in obliterated cochlea].
    Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Aug; 78(8):421-8. PubMed ID: 10488461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The nucleus double array cochlear implant: a new concept for the obliterated cochlea.
    Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Issing PR; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11314711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nucleus double electrode array: a new approach for ossified cochleae.
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Lesinski A; Parker J
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S39-41. PubMed ID: 9391590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.
    Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Saccetto L; Giarbini N; Carner M
    Audiology; 1999; 38(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 10431908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
    Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The results in patients implanted with the nucleus double array cochlear implant: pitch discrimination and auditory performance.
    Lenarz T; Büchner A; Tasche C; Cristofoli T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Wallenberg EV; Battmer RD; Busby PA; Frohne C
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):90S-101S. PubMed ID: 11883772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].
    Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):356-9. PubMed ID: 8376183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB; Boëx C; Pelizzone M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma.
    Biedron S; Prescher A; Ilgner J; Westhofen M
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 20142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partial and double-array implantation of the ossified cochlea.
    Roland JT; Coelho DH; Pantelides H; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1068-75. PubMed ID: 18833022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basal turn cochleostomy via the middle fossa route for cochlear implant insertion.
    Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Carner M; Pacini L
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):778-84. PubMed ID: 9831154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Lane JI; Witte RJ; Driscoll CL; Shallop JK; Beatty CW; Primak AN
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):658-62. PubMed ID: 17558341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal bone investigations on landmarks for conventional or endosteal insertion of cochlear electrodes.
    Pau HW; Just T; Dommerich S; Behrend D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 17712669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Indications for middle ear obliteration within the scope of cochlear implant management].
    Issing PR; Schönermark M; Kempf HG; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):727-31. PubMed ID: 9081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.