These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10488506)

  • 21. The effect of torque pressure on halo pin complication rates. A randomized prospective study.
    Rizzolo SJ; Piazza MR; Cotler JM; Hume EL; Cautilli G; O'Neill DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Nov; 18(15):2163-6. PubMed ID: 8278826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does routine pin re-torquing of patients wearing a halo-thoracic orthosis reduce the need for pin replacement?
    Fraser S; Coffey JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Aug; 39(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 24812117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring the use of halo fixation device through an assessment form.
    Ho CH; Li KK; Chin RP; Lee HW; Kwong WY; Kwan HH
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2011 Dec; 19(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 22184163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Osteology of the pediatric skull. Considerations of halo pin placement.
    Wong WB; Haynes RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jul; 19(13):1451-4. PubMed ID: 7939973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The force exerted by the halo pin. A study comparing different halo systems.
    Whitesides TE; Mehserle WL; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Oct; 17(10 Suppl):S413-7. PubMed ID: 1440036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of halo pin insertion torque on outer table penetration in elderly patients.
    Ebraheim NA; Liu J; Patil V; Hiltner L; Shapiro A; Zamary KR; Dick DC; Yeasting RA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 19412019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of midface fracture repair using absorbable plate and screw system pilot holes drilled and pin placement at angles other than 90°.
    Carron MA; Zuliani G; Pereira L; Abuhamdan M; Thibault A; Dau N; Bir C
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2014; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 24158595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation of how different halos influence pin forces.
    Kerwin GA; Chou KL; White DB; Shen KL; Salciccioli GG; Yang KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 May; 19(9):1078-81. PubMed ID: 8029746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pneumocranium secondary to halo vest pin penetration through an enlarged frontal sinus.
    Cheong ML; Chan CY; Saw LB; Kwan MK
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jul; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):269-71. PubMed ID: 19390875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frontolateral pins for halo ring placement: reassessment of a common neurosurgical procedure with CT measurements of skull thickness.
    Stone JL; Gulabani A; Gorelick G; Vannemreddy SN; Vannemreddy PS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):744-9. PubMed ID: 24138060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of Alternative Halo Ring Positions in Children Using Tomography.
    Tavares-Júnior MCM; Munhoz DU; de Souza JPV; Marcon RM; Cristante AF; Letaif OB
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2019 Mar; 74():e781. PubMed ID: 30892417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Halo pin positioning in the temporal bone; parameters for safe halo gravity traction.
    Semmelink K; Hekman EEG; van Griethuysen M; Bosma J; Swaan A; Kruyt MC
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jan; 9(1):255-261. PubMed ID: 32915397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A biomechanical analysis of halo fixation in children.
    Letts M; Kaylor D; Gouw G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1988 Mar; 70(2):277-9. PubMed ID: 3346303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A biomechanical study of torque and accuracy of halo pin insertional devices.
    Smith MD; Johnson LJ; Perra JH; Rawlins BA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Feb; 78(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 8609114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A biomechanical comparison of Gardner-Wells tongs and halo device used for cervical spine traction.
    Lerman JA; Haynes RJ; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Wong WB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(21):2403-6. PubMed ID: 7846592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The halo skeletal fixator: current concepts of application and maintenance.
    Botte MJ; Byrne TP; Abrams RA; Garfin SR
    Orthopedics; 1995 May; 18(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 7610094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The aiming device for cervical distractor pin insertion: a proof-of-concept, feasibility study.
    Bunmaprasert T; Luangkittikong S; Tosinthiti M; Nivescharoenpisan S; Raphitphan R; Sugandhavesa N; Liawrungrueang W; Riew KD
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jul; 22(1):648. PubMed ID: 34330246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The thickness of skull at the halo pin insertion site.
    Chavasiri C; Chavasiri S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(22):1819-23. PubMed ID: 21099739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of the oblique medial osteotomy angle during osteochondral fragment fixation in patients with a posteromedial osteochondral lesion of the talus.
    Tsuyuguchi Y; Nakasa T; Ikuta Y; Sumii J; Nekomoto A; Kawabata S; Adachi N
    J Orthop Sci; 2023 Sep; 28(5):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 35864028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pin penetration depths in the neurocranium using a three-pin head fixation device.
    Machts R; Schindler M; Unterhauser-Chwastek H; Mertens J; Faust K
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4726. PubMed ID: 38413760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.