These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10488511)

  • 1. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain.
    Taylor SJ; Taylor AE; Foy MA; Fogg AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1805-12. PubMed ID: 10488511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A low back-specific version of the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale.
    Davidson M; Keating JL; Eyres S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Mar; 29(5):586-94. PubMed ID: 15129079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.
    Davidson M; Keating JL
    Phys Ther; 2002 Jan; 82(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 11784274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica.
    Patrick DL; Deyo RA; Atlas SJ; Singer DE; Chapin A; Keller RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(17):1899-908; discussion 1909. PubMed ID: 8560339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.
    Grotle M; Brox JI; Vøllestad NK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):E492-501. PubMed ID: 15507789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Oct; 7():82. PubMed ID: 17064410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responsiveness and interpretability of the Portuguese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Vieira AC; Moniz S; Fernandes R; Carnide F; Cruz EB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E346-52. PubMed ID: 24573078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsiveness of the short-form 36 and oswestry disability questionnaire in chronic nonspecific low back and lower limb pain treated with customized foot orthotics.
    Ferrari R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007; 30(6):456-8. PubMed ID: 17693336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1717-28. PubMed ID: 16736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences.
    Fujimori T; Miwa T; Oda T
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 29792993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain.
    Garratt AM; Klaber Moffett J; Farrin AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(1):71-7; discussion 77. PubMed ID: 11148649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
    Frost H; Lamb SE; Stewart-Brown S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 18824951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.
    Bendebba M; Dizerega GS; Long DM
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 17197345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.
    Chapman JR; Norvell DC; Hermsmeyer JT; Bransford RJ; DeVine J; McGirt MJ; Lee MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. PubMed ID: 21952190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery.
    Mannion AF; Junge A; Grob D; Dvorak J; Fairbank JC
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jan; 15(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 15856340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.
    Pengel LH; Refshauge KM; Maher CG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):879-83. PubMed ID: 15082988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 1: the assessment of outcome.
    McGregor AH; Hughes SP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jul; 27(13):1465-70. PubMed ID: 12131748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
    Anagnostis C; Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Oct; 29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. PubMed ID: 15480144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.