154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10490004)
1. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies.
Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Freedman LS; Li L
Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 150(6):642-51. PubMed ID: 10490004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications.
Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Bingham S; Schatzkin A; Subar A; Carroll RJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 153(4):394-403. PubMed ID: 11207158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement error and results from analytic epidemiology: dietary fat and breast cancer.
Prentice RL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Dec; 88(23):1738-47. PubMed ID: 8944004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman L; Bingham S; Day NE; Riboli E; Ferrari P; Carroll RJ
Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6A):915-23. PubMed ID: 12633516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.
Kipnis V; Subar AF; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Ballard-Barbash R; Troiano RP; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Schatzkin A; Carroll RJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6. PubMed ID: 12835281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer.
Rosner B; Gore R
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Nov; 154(9):827-35. PubMed ID: 11682365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires to estimate the distribution of usual intake.
Carroll RJ; Freedman LS; Hartman AM
Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 143(4):392-404. PubMed ID: 8633623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.
Freedman LS; Schatzkin A; Midthune D; Kipnis V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(14):1086-92. PubMed ID: 21653922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allowing for never and episodic consumers when correcting for error in food record measurements of dietary intake.
Keogh RH; White IR
Biostatistics; 2011 Oct; 12(4):624-36. PubMed ID: 21378386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of regression calibration to non-perfect validation data with application to the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.
Buonaccorsi JP; Dalen I; Laake P; Hjartåker A; Engeset D; Thoresen M
Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1389-403. PubMed ID: 25627982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error.
Rosner B; Willett WC; Spiegelman D
Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1051-69; discussion 1071-3. PubMed ID: 2799131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and systematic error in measuring carotenoid consumption with dietary self-report instruments.
Natarajan L; Flatt SW; Sun X; Gamst AC; Major JM; Rock CL; Al-Delaimy W; Thomson CA; Newman VA; Pierce JP;
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 163(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 16524958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement error correction for nutritional exposures with correlated measurement error: use of the method of triads in a longitudinal setting.
Rosner B; Michels KB; Chen YH; Day NE
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3466-89. PubMed ID: 18416440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-efficient design of a diet validation study.
Stram DO; Longnecker MP; Shames L; Kolonel LN; Wilkens LR; Pike MC; Henderson BE
Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 142(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 7631639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardization of dietary intake measurements by nonlinear calibration using short-term reference data.
Hoffmann K; Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Boeing H
Am J Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 156(9):862-70. PubMed ID: 12397005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of two-part regression calibration model to correct for measurement error in episodically consumed foods in a single-replicate study design: EPIC case study.
Agogo GO; van der Voet H; van't Veer P; Ferrari P; Leenders M; Muller DC; Sánchez-Cantalejo E; Bamia C; Braaten T; Knüppel S; Johansson I; van Eeuwijk FA; Boshuizen H
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113160. PubMed ID: 25402487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of a repeat-measure biomarker measurement error model to 2 validation studies: examination of the effect of within-person variation in biomarker measurements.
Preis SR; Spiegelman D; Zhao BB; Moshfegh A; Baer DJ; Willett WC
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(6):683-94. PubMed ID: 21343245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of measurement error on energy-adjustment models in nutritional epidemiology.
Kipnis V; Freedman LS; Brown CC; Hartman AM; Schatzkin A; Wacholder S
Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 146(10):842-55. PubMed ID: 9384205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error.
Rosner B; Spiegelman D; Willett WC
Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Oct; 132(4):734-45. PubMed ID: 2403114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
