These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10490410)

  • 1. Privacy in genetics research.
    Fuller BP; Kahn MJ; Barr PA; Biesecker L; Crowley E; Garber J; Mansoura MK; Murphy P; Murray J; Phillips J; Rothenberg K; Rothstein M; Stopfer J; Swergold G; Weber B; Collins FK; Hudson KL
    Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5432):1359-61. PubMed ID: 10490410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Institutional review boards, genetic research, and privacy.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):6. PubMed ID: 11660229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US privacy laws may curb access to medical data.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Apr; 386(6625):533. PubMed ID: 9121564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical issues in genetic research: disclosure and informed consent.
    Reilly PR; Boshar MF; Holtzman SH
    Nat Genet; 1997 Jan; 15(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8988163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the Genetic Privacy Act on medicine.
    Reilly PR
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 8715060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dangerous intersections.
    Korn D
    Issues Sci Technol; 1996; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11654761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic testing and informed consent.
    Page DL; Jensen RA
    JAMA; 1997 Sep; 278(10):821-2. PubMed ID: 9293987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US geneticists encouraged to play by the book.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6778):530. PubMed ID: 10787343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why the use of anonymous samples for research matters.
    Clayton EW
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(4):375-7. PubMed ID: 8715059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Privacy bill under fire from researchers.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):6. PubMed ID: 9510231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Panel proposes tighter rules for tissue studies.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5397):2165-6. PubMed ID: 9890818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Genetic Privacy Act: an analysis of privacy and research concerns.
    Troy ES
    J Law Med Ethics; 1997; 25(4):256-72, 230. PubMed ID: 11066508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical and legal issues in genetic epidemiology.
    Holtzman NA; Andrews LB
    Epidemiol Rev; 1997; 19(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 9360913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Privacy issues in second stage genomics.
    Robertson JA
    Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():59-76. PubMed ID: 14621715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drafting the Genetic Privacy Act: science, policy, and practical considerations.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Roche PA
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 8715056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Certificates of confidentiality: a valuable tool for protecting genetic data.
    Earley CL; Strong LC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Sep; 57(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 7668302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Environmental Genome Project and bioethics.
    Sharp RR; Barrett JC
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Jun; 9(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 11657327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structuring the review of human genetics protocols: gene localization and identification studies.
    Glass KC; Weijer C; Palmour RM; Shapiro SH; Lemmens TM; Lebacqz K
    IRB; 1996; 18(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 11654877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geneticists oppose consent ruling.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6774):114-5. PubMed ID: 10724137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.