66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10490745)
1. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 10490745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10490744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of physical imaging properties among three kinds of imaging plates used in photostimulable phosphor systems for dental radiography.
Nishikawa K; Ooguro T; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2002 Feb; 43(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography.
Brettle DS; Workman A; Ellwood RP; Launders JH; Horner K; Davies RM
Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):256-61. PubMed ID: 8800870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD-based system for digital chest radiography.
Båth M; Sund P; Månsson LG
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2286-97. PubMed ID: 12408303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.
Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 7565348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor.
Tsuchida R; Araki K; Endo A; Funahashi I; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 16243247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; Li G; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Okamura K; McDavid WD; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.
Kengyelics SM; Launders JH; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 9547503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
